Search — Theology Explorer

Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more

All (8547) Scripture Commentary (2798) Theology (184) Mike Winger (5535) Pulpit (30)

Mike Winger idea 2022-06-20

Jewish rabbis used similar 'no male and female' language without implying role obliteration

Mike cites ancient Jewish parallels to demonstrate the phrase's cultural meaning was narrower than egalitarians claim.

Exodus Rabbah Beshallach 21:4 Ben Witherington III Madeleine Boucher Seder Eliahu Rabbah 7

Mike Winger idea 2022-06-20

Mike's thesis: role differences do not violate status in Christ

Mike states his main conclusion from the video.

philosophical presuppositions role differences status in Christ

Mike Winger idea 2022-07-18

Introduction: The Bible clearly states husbands are the head of their wives

Mike introduces the topic of male headship, stating this is a deeply researched video on whether husbands being the head of their wives is truly biblical.

Jewish rabbis used similar 'no male and female' language without implying role obliteration

Mike's thesis: role differences do not violate status in Christ

Introduction: The Bible clearly states husbands are the head of their wives

Egalitarian tactic: redefine 'head' (kephale) to mean something other than authority

The stakes: either husbands shirk responsibility by not leading, or they oppress by trying to lead

Invitation to scholars: Mike welcomes pushback from Linda Belleville, Philip Payne, and others

Church history argument introduced: Chrysostom supposedly shows kephale doesn't mean authority

Mike's personal journey: initially found egalitarian arguments persuasive before deeper research revealed problems

Philip Payne claims ancient Greek thought regarded the heart, not the brain, as the control center

Second Plato quote: the head is the most divine part, and the body is its servant

Egalitarian scholars echo each other's errors, tracing back to Bedale's short article

Egalitarian scholars selectively use historical quotes — Bedale's article echoed uncritically

Contextual/Bible study argument: Ronald Pierce and Rebecca Merrill Groothuis claim Paul only reinforces 'source/provision,' not authority

Pierce and Groothuis's claim that Paul 'only reinforces source/provision' is contradicted by the biblical evidence

Pierce and Groothuis argue that Paul commands husbands to love, not to exercise authority — a false dichotomy

Lynn Cohick claims seeing authority in headship 'violates Paul's intention in metaphor'

Cohick's either/or: she does not acknowledge kephale could mean both source and leader

Church history argument: Kathleen Kroeger, founder of Christians for Biblical Equality (CBE)

Kroeger's selective Chrysostom quote: she omits sentences before, after, and within the passage

Full Chrysostom quote: 'thou art the head of the woman... let the head regulate the rest of the body' — Chrysostom strongly supports headship as authority

Church history conclusion: the church has virtually always agreed that headship means authority and that eldership is male-only

Many lexicons that don't use the word 'leader' still support authority with terms like chief, subordinate, sovereignty, lord, ruler, master

Richard Cervin's article — the source behind egalitarian lexical claims; problematic methodology

Cervin uses only author-specific lexicons (Plato, Thucydides) from much earlier periods of Greek — not Koine Greek

Grudem's critique of the LSJ: 'source' is literal (rivers only), not metaphorical; plural kephale = sources, singular = mouth of river

Grudem argues the LSJ should be revised and provides extensive Greek examples of kephale meaning authority

Peter Glare, editor of the LSJ, writes to Grudem agreeing with his conclusions — 'the supposed sense source of course does not exist'

Glare: kephale translates Hebrew rosh meaning leader/chief; by NT times Septuagint usage was well-established; LSJ has 'inadequacies'

Glare: 'in most cases the sense of the head as being the controlling agent is the one required'

Mike's assessment: egalitarian scholarship on kephale is propped up with misinformation

Five conclusions: (1) medical thought supports authority; (2) Paul's context implies authority; (3) church history supports authority; (4) lexical study strongly supports authority; (5) egalitarian claims are often problematic

Preview: next video will be on head coverings — a thorough examination of 1 Corinthians 11

Central question of the video: Does the Bible teach an authority imbalance in marriage?

Egalitarian view of marriage gaining popularity primarily in westernized First World countries

Submission as character quality, not just cultural convenience

Sarah calling Abraham 'Lord' (Genesis 18:12) and what it means

1 Peter 3:7 -- Instructions to husbands: understanding, honor, and equal inheritance

Wife as precious vessel and co-heir -- equal inheritance in Christ

Heart of complementarianism: equal value, different authority, mutual accountability

Colossians 3:18-19 -- wives submit, husbands love and don't be harsh

Ephesians 5:21-24 -- instructions to wives including headship analogy

Marriage grounded in creation (Genesis) and salvation (Christ and church), not culture

Conclusions: husband's authority is real but limited compared to cultural expectations

Church history has strongly supported complementarian interpretation

Peter Davids' egalitarian view of 1 Peter 3: submission is only for evangelism

Problems with Davids' reliance on the Testament of Abraham

Craig Keener's addition: Abraham also 'obeys' Sarah (Genesis 16:2, 21:12)

Lynn Kohick's egalitarian view of Colossians 3:18-19: no talk of husband's authority

Keener's two-pillar case: mutual submission and cultural bowing

Keener's four steps: household codes, perceived threat, defensive writing, Paul's strategy

Bible Link Settings