Real Historian Responds to "Jesus Was a Myth" Claims
Ideas (62)
Introduction: Mike Winger introduces the topic of Jesus mythicism and its growing online influence
Opening segment of livestream
00:00:02The Zeitgeist film and Bill Maher's Religulous cited as catalysts for the modern Jesus myth movement
Identifying pop-culture sources of Jesus mythicism
00:00:33Guest introduction: Dr. Mike Licona, historical Jesus scholar with PhD from University of Pretoria
Guest credentials and background
00:01:05Scholarly consensus: Jesus mythicism is not a live discussion in academic New Testament studies or history
Mike Licona characterizes the state of scholarly opinion on mythicism
00:02:37Bart Ehrman's statement: mythicist view has no foothold among modern critical scholars
Quoting agnostic/atheist scholar to demonstrate non-Christian scholarly consensus
00:03:07Maurice Casey (agnostic) concludes mythicist arguments are completely spurious, put forward by incompetent and unqualified people
Quoting another non-Christian scholar on mythicism
00:04:08Joseph Hoffmann (agnostic, Harvard/Oxford) calls mythicists the greatest threat to calm academic study of religion next to fundamentalism
Third non-Christian scholar quoted condemning mythicism
00:05:12Analogy: Entertaining Jesus mythicism is like scientists debating Flat Earth, or historians entertaining Holocaust denial
Illustrating the scholarly view of Jesus mythicism's credibility level
00:06:15Non-Christian sources for Jesus: Josephus, Tacitus, and Lucian of Samosata all mention Jesus
Overview of non-Christian historical sources for Jesus
00:06:49Tacitus places Jesus's execution under Tiberius Caesar while Pontius Pilate was procurator; both Tacitus and Lucian are hostile to Christianity
Significance of hostile sources attesting to Jesus
00:07:50Paul as historical witness: he knew Jesus's brother James, persecuted the church, and lived in the same region and time as Jesus
Discussing Paul's evidence for the historical Jesus
00:08:22Argument: Paul's conversion is inexplicable if Jesus were fictional — he was in Jerusalem at the same time as the crucifixion
Using Paul's personal proximity to events to argue against mythicism
00:09:24The Gospels (especially Mark and John) contain eyewitness testimony, serving as evidence for a historical Jesus
The Gospels as historical sources
00:10:28The rapid genesis and spread of the Christian movement is hard to explain if Jesus were fictional and not within living memory
Sociological argument for historical Jesus
00:11:28Josephus mentions Jesus twice: Antiquities 18.63 (disputed) and Antiquities 20.200 (virtually undisputed)
Explaining the two Josephus passages
00:12:30The Testimonium Flavianum (Antiquities 18.63) was interpolated by a Christian, but most scholars think an authentic Josephus reference to Jesus underlies it
Scholarly consensus on the interpolation question in Josephus
00:13:01Louis Feldman (leading Josephus scholar, Jewish, non-Christian) believed Josephus mentioned Jesus in both passages, estimated 3-to-1 or 5-to-1 ratio of scholars who agree
Expert Josephus scholarly opinion on the authenticity question
00:14:34Tacitus spells "Christos" correctly even while initially writing "Chrestus" — the full passage explicitly identifies Christ as executed under Pontius Pilate under Tiberius
Addressing the "different group" objection to Tacitus
00:17:10Richard Carrier's claim that all extra-biblical sources simply copy Gospel accounts is refuted by Tacitus's late date and hostile stance
Refuting Carrier's hypothesis that non-Christian sources merely echo the Gospels
00:18:40The dying and rising gods parallel argument fails because Paul and non-Christian sources still have to be explained independently of the Gospels
Initial response to the Greco-Roman dying/rising gods parallel argument
00:20:49First-century Christians were pious, Torah-observant Jews who debated minutiae of Jewish law — making wholesale borrowing from pagan myths implausible
Cultural argument against the pagan parallels theory
00:21:21Analogy: Parallel details in the B-29 Empire State Building crash (1945) and 9/11 do not mean 9/11 was copied — you need a causal connection
Illustrating that parallel details alone prove nothing without demonstrating causal connection
00:22:21Historians are unpersuaded by pagan parallels because the parallels are not actually that similar; Asclepius is the closest pre-Jesus parallel and only heals/occasionally raises dead
Examining specific pagan parallels to Jesus
00:23:26Apollonius of Tyana, the closest post-Jesus parallel, did not believe in resurrection and has only one account of an after-death appearance — in a dream to one disciple
Examining the post-Jesus pagan parallel most cited by mythicists
00:24:32Mythicists must composite multiple figures (Dionysus, Horus, Asclepius, Apollonius, Hercules) to approximate Jesus — historians reject this method
Exposing the composite methodology of Jesus-myth parallels
00:25:32Analogy: Compositing Lincoln, JFK, and fictional David Palmer to "prove" Obama is a myth illustrates the fallacy of the mythicist composite method
Illustrating the logical fallacy in compositing pagan parallels
00:26:35Richard Carrier's claim that Paul only describes a Jesus in outer space, never on earth
Presenting a key mythicist argument from Richard Carrier about Paul
00:28:10Romans 1:3 refutes the "outer space Jesus" claim — Paul explicitly places Jesus as a historical descendant of David born in the flesh
Exegetical refutation of Carrier's cosmic Jesus interpretation
00:29:40Some mythicists argue "James the brother of the Lord" means a fellow believer, not a biological brother of Jesus
Mythicist reinterpretation of Paul's reference to James
00:30:44Refutation: Paul and Jesus use "brothers" for all believers, but Matthew names four brothers of Jesus including James — confirmed by Josephus
Multiple source attestation for James as biological brother of Jesus
00:31:15John 7 records Jesus's brothers not believing in him during his ministry, then Acts records them as believers after resurrection — this disbelief/conversion arc supports biological relationship
The conversion of Jesus's brothers as evidence for their biological relationship
00:32:50Multiple independent attestation from Paul, Matthew, John (special L), and Josephus — the strongest form of historical evidence — confirms Jesus's brothers including James
Summary of multiple attestation for Jesus's brothers
00:33:21Lack of contemporary accounts of Jesus is explained by low literacy rates (~10%), oral transmission culture, and early Christian expectation of imminent return
Responding to the objection that no writings about Jesus exist from his lifetime
00:34:24Much ancient literature is lost: two-thirds of Tacitus's Histories, 12 of Plutarch's 60 biographies — including his life of Caesar Augustus
Contextualizing the argument from silence by noting the loss of ancient literature
00:35:27Roman historians didn't mention Jesus more because he wasn't significant to Roman history — they didn't even mention Pontius Pilate, known only from Philo, Josephus, and NT sources
Explaining the relative silence of Roman sources about Jesus
00:36:27Argument from silence illustrated: Josephus omits his own capture by Romans from his autobiography; Grant's memoirs never mention the Emancipation Proclamation
Further examples showing argument from silence is a weak form of evidence
00:38:00Objection that scholars affirm historicity only because they signed faith statements is refuted by citing atheist/agnostic scholars who agree
Responding to the claim that Christian bias explains scholarly consensus on historicity
00:39:31Suggestion to mythicists: attend the Society of Biblical Literature annual meeting and ask scholars directly whether Jesus existed
Practical advice for those skeptical of scholarly consensus
00:41:02Virtual scholarly consensus on historical facts about Jesus: lived in Palestine, believed special relationship with God, performed astonishing deeds, taught in parables, criticized Jewish leaders, crucified under Pilate
Summarizing the bedrock facts about Jesus accepted by virtually all historians including non-Christians
00:42:03The consensus extends well beyond a minimal "one man named Jesus died by crucifixion" — substantial historical data about Jesus is agreed upon
Qualifying the extent of the historical consensus on Jesus
00:43:36Bart Ehrman is in a small minority who deny Jesus was known as a miracle worker during his lifetime; most scholars disagree
Noting limits and minority positions within the broader consensus
00:44:08Methodological principle: dismissing miracle claims in historical sources reflects worldview bias, not following the evidence
Responding to the claim that miracle claims in historical sources can be safely dismissed
00:45:39Audience question: "Consensus holds Jesus existed but was not the Christ of the Gospels" — Licona: that is not a consensus position
Audience Q&A — addressing the claimed scholarly consensus against Gospel accounts
00:46:39Audience Q: Why doesn't anyone reference Tacitus on Christian persecution until the 4th century? — Multiple 1st-century sources confirm early persecution of Christians
Audience question from "Godless Engineer" about Christian persecution attestation
00:47:11Suetonius's reference to "Chrestus" in Life of Claudius possibly refers to Jesus — but Suetonius is chronologically challenged if it does
Discussing Suetonius as a possible extra-biblical source for Jesus
00:49:16Suetonius's report of Claudius expelling Jews from Rome matches Acts 18 — illustrating how omissions in one source don't prove falsehood; Josephus doesn't mention this expulsion
Cross-referencing Suetonius and Acts; illustrating argument from silence
00:50:50Did Paul hallucinate seeing Jesus? Hallucinations are private, not group experiences — Paul's companions also saw the light and heard the voice (Acts 9)
Audience Q about whether Paul hallucinated his encounter with the risen Jesus
00:52:27Paul quotes Psalm 16:10 in Acts 13, arguing Jesus's body did not decay — therefore the resurrection was physical and bodily, not merely visionary
Paul's bodily resurrection theology inferred from Acts 13
00:53:28Paul's resurrection theology reconstructed from 1 Corinthians 15: Christ is firstfruits; believers will be raised at Christ's coming in the same manner
Paul's own teaching on the nature of resurrection
00:54:30Paul's eschatology: 2 Corinthians 5:8 and Philippians 1:20-22 show an intermediate disembodied state after death, before the final bodily resurrection
Paul's two-stage eschatological framework
00:55:321 Thessalonians 4: Jesus will "bring with him" the dead in Christ, whose spirits are reunited with raised bodies — a transformer/transformative resurrection
Paul's 1 Thessalonians 4 passage on resurrection and the coming of Christ
00:56:34Summary: Paul taught physical/bodily resurrection; hallucination theory fails; Paul was not grieving Jesus's death — he was glad Jesus was dead before his conversion
Concluding the section on Paul's resurrection belief
00:57:05Audience Q on mimesis: pagan parallels fail for the same reasons, plus early Christians were Torah-observant Jews who would not borrow from pagan myths
Audience question about mimesis / pagan parallel arguments
00:57:36Richard Carrier's claim that all historians have concluded the criteria of authenticity are invalid is false — most historians still embrace the criteria
Audience Q about the methodology of validating historicity of Christ
00:59:09Licona published a critique of the Keith/Le Donne volume in the Bulletin for Biblical Research, arguing scholars are too pessimistic about the criteria
Licona's scholarly engagement with the debate over historical criteria
01:00:10John Dominic Crossan in debate with Licona affirmed the use of criteria — demonstrating that most historians still rely on them
Licona's debate with Crossan as evidence of continuing scholarly use of criteria
01:01:11The criteria of authenticity are not magical — they are common-sense principles: prioritize early sources, eyewitness reports, unsympathetic sources, multiple independent attestation
Explaining what the criteria of authenticity actually are
01:02:13Advice to those influenced by Richard Carrier: read other skeptical scholars — Ehrman, Lüdemann, Casey — who have proper training in historical Jesus scholarship
Practical guidance for those following Carrier's mythicist arguments
01:03:15Licona's book Why Are There Differences in the Gospels? required classicist review to avoid errors in Plutarch material — illustrating disciplinary boundaries
Personal example of the importance of disciplinary specialization
01:04:17Only a handful of bona fide scholars deny Jesus's existence — Carrier said there were seven including himself, none widely respected in their disciplines
Quantifying the scholarly minority who deny Jesus's historical existence
01:05:17Your Tags
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more
Personal labels you apply to any item — separate from system topics. Tags are shared across all databases. Visit /tags to browse all your tags.
...more