Search — Theology Explorer

1 Corinthians 11:5-6 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 shaving analogy argument from shame

Paul's first argument: shaving analogy (verses 5-6)

Mike identifies five distinct arguments Paul makes to support head coverings.

Esther 6:12 Septuagint Preston Massie kata kephales

kata kephales in verse 4: Septuagint evidence from Esther 6:12 confirms cloth covering

Mike examines another Greek phrase supporting cloth coverings.

Numbers 6 Craig Keener Samson Epictetus

Exceptions to hair length rules: Nazirite vows, philosophers, and the principle behind exceptions

Mike discusses how exceptions to the general rule were understood.

1 Corinthians 11:10 1 Corinthians 11:10 angelic observers worship context

Mike's preferred view: holy angelic observers who delight in seeing God's order in worship

Mike presents his conclusion on the angels question.

1 Timothy 2 1 Corinthians 14 1 Corinthians 11:3 women in ministry complementarianism eldership

Final conclusions: male headship is biblical, complementarian, and to be celebrated

Mike delivers his overall conclusions for the passage.

1 Corinthians 14:34-35 biblical authority 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 women's silence in church

Introduction of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 as a highly controversial passage

Mike reads the passage and acknowledges modern readers will find it offensive, but states his main concern is understanding what it actually means in context.

1 Corinthians 14:36 quotation-refutation view 1 Corinthians 14:36 e/eta (disjunctive particle)

Greek hinge point: The disjunctive particle 'e' (eta) in verse 36

Mike examines the Greek word translated 'what' or 'or' in verse 36 that carries the entire weight of the refutation argument.

quotation-refutation view Pauline refutation style

Paul never addresses the specific content he allegedly refutes

Mike highlights that if Paul is refuting verses 34-35, he never actually addresses any of the specific claims.

1 Corinthians 14:35 education view 1 Corinthians 14:35 asking husbands at home

Advantage of the education view: it explains the 'ask husbands at home' phrase well

Mike acknowledges the education view has one genuine strength.

Craig Keener universal scope women elders

Education View Hinge 2: Why ALL women in EVERY church?

Mike presses the problem of universal scope for the education view.

Mike Winger idea 2024-03-01

Deborah as the chief counter-example to patriarchalist restrictions

Mike presents a detailed analysis of Deborah as judge.

Judges 2:16 Judges 2:18 Judges 4-5 Deborah Barak Judges 2:16

Mike Winger idea 2018-11-14

Proverbs 19:11 — it is glorious to overlook an offense, inverting the cultural shame of not retaliating.

Fourth Proverbs passage; Mike challenges the instinct to 'get back' at someone who wrongs you.

Proverbs 19:11 grace forgiveness anger

discernment apologetics false-teaching

Zahnd's three-step method for dismantling orthodox Christianity and replacing it with his own version

Winger maps out the structural argument Zahnd uses in his book 'Sinners in the Hands of a Loving God.'

discernment hell false-teaching

Zahnd's straw man: misrepresenting 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' as representative of all American Christianity

Winger examines chapter one of Zahnd's book, which opens with extensive quotation from Jonathan Edwards's Puritan sermon.

hermeneutics discernment false-teaching

Shame is Zahnd's primary rhetorical device; his Rorschach accusation is a projection of his own method

Winger analyzes Zahnd's use of psychological shaming and his Rorschach test analogy from the book.