limited atonement ?

All content tagged with this topic across every database — articles, Mike Winger ideas, and verse entries on one screen.

...more

Introduction: topic triggered by viewer question and James White announcing he would listen

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Definition of limited atonement: Jesus's death only paid for the sins of the elect

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Comparison chart: limited atonement vs. universal atonement vs. universalism on extent and application

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Critique: limited atonement is mostly supported by philosophical reasoning, not direct scriptural teaching

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

2 Corinthians 5:14-15 — the Calvinist logical argument for limited atonement from this text

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Even granting the Calvinist reading of 2 Cor 5:14, it only affirms Jesus died for the elect — it does not deny he died for others

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Fallacy of negative inference illustrated by Galatians 2:20

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Universal atonement motivates evangelism; limited atonement undermines the sincere gospel call

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Paul's application of the theology confirms the universal-extent, limited-application reading: the missions mandate

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

2 Peter 2:1 — Christ bought even false prophets who deny him and face destruction, proving atonement extends beyond the elect

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Summary: multiple scriptures confirm universal extent, non-universal application; rejecting limited atonement does not require leaving Calvinism

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Dr. David Allen — key scholarly resource on the atonement; two books cited; potential interview guest

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

1 John 2:2 — Jesus is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only but for the sins of the whole world

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Calvinist reinterpretation of 1 John 2:2: 'whole world' means Gentile believers scattered abroad, paralleled with John 11:51-52

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

'All without distinction' logically entails 'all without exception' — the Calvinist formula collapses

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Homework challenge: find one verse where kosmos clearly means the elect — D.A. Carson says no such verse exists

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

James White tweet: respectful but firm disagreement; White acknowledged for textual criticism work and Ehrman debate

Limited Atonement, Universalism and why I disagree with both.

Introduction: inside-baseball soteriology debate; response to James White on limited atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Overview of five Calvinist objections to be addressed

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Objection 1 stated: Trinitarian harmony in the atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Objection 2 stated: the failure of the Son

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Objection 3 stated: intercession linked to atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Objection 4 stated: John Owen's trilemma

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Objection 5 stated: double jeopardy / double payment

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Sixth item: clear Scripture texts refuting limited atonement — especially 1 John 2:2

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Trinitarian harmony used as a theological trump card to override clear Scripture texts

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Scripture should trump philosophical reasoning; most limited atonement arguments are not exegetical

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Response to Trinitarian harmony #1: it assumes a single, limited intention for each person of the Trinity without scriptural proof

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Romans 10:21 — God holds out his hands to a disobedient people; implies genuine offer of salvation

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Trinitarian harmony assumes unnecessary correlation: individual election does not logically require limited atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Romans 8:29-32 and the golden chain of redemption used to argue for limited atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Negative inference fallacy: Romans 8 makes inclusive statements, not exclusive ones about the atonement's extent

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Many are called but few are chosen; preaching the gospel to all implies a genuine offer for all

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Ephesians 2 refutes the intercession argument: the elect were still under wrath after the cross, before believing

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Owen's trilemma implies the elect were forgiven before they believed — which Ephesians 2 contradicts

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Double jeopardy objection answered: Ephesians 2 proves the elect were under wrath after the cross, i.e., already "double payment" on limited atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

James White misrepresented Mike's position on "world" in 1 John 2:2

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Calvinist "Jews and Gentiles" default reading of kosmos does not rescue limited atonement

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

1 John 3:1 and 3:13 — "world" in the same letter refers to those who do not know God

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

1 John 4:3-5 and 5:19 — "the whole world lies under the power of the evil one" confirms kosmos is non-elect

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

Closing: Scripture texts for unlimited atonement still stand; Calvinist trump concepts do not override them

Responding to Calvinist Arguments for Limited Atonement

1 John 3:4-10 does not teach sinless perfectionism — the Greek present tense indicates habitual lifestyle of sin, not single acts

20 Questions with Pastor Mike (Episode 26)

Hoo boy! I don’t know how, but I managed to listen to the whole debate. Cheryl, you had much more patience and poise than I would have had. I took some quick notes, and here are the main things I put...

I feel the need to share my experience with Matt Slick since I have found him to be one of the biggest hypocrites in the professing church today. My history with Matt has gone on for over 10 years and...

Heidi, I am also working on a DVD project that refutes Limited Atonement specifically from John 6. <https://mmoutreach.org/tg/>. When I was dealing with Slick years ago, he tried to push me on this i...

And Jn 3:16 refutes limited atonement completely, as does 1 Jn 2:2, 1 Tim. 4:9-10, 2 Co. 5:14-15, 1 Jn 4:14, Jn 1:29. The premise behind limited atonement is that if Jesus died for everyone then every...

Cheryl, First of all i never called you a semi-pelagian. I asked you to show me how your view is not semi-pelagian, there is a difference. From what you have written it seems that we somewhat are cl...

Mark, You said: > So we both agree that God draws, calls, opens eyes, soften hearts all before people accept the message of Christ. But yet i guess we still disagree that faith is a gift. I’m quite...

Cheryl, First I will respond to some of your comments regarding the nature of the atonement and after that I will move on to your last two lots of exegetical points. “You keep saying that only a spe...

Mark, Thanks for your quick response. You said: > It is important to note that the atonement is the ‘canceling’ of our debt. That is, Jesus took our sin and the punishment for our sin onto his shou...

If Judas would have repented (possible) or not gone rogue, I believe the prophecy could be applied to someone else or not at all (if it was illustrative application vs predictive; the NT would have be...

I don’t know for sure what happens to babies or those that lack mental and moral capacity. I can only speak to what Scripture says. I hope and personally believe they will be but have nothing to stand...

Hi Cheryl! 🙂 I’ve been away for a while. Starting to get caught up. I love your challenge to Calvinists. I’ve been using my downtime to work on a project, dealing with Calvinism’s EXTREME view of ‘...

Hi Cheryl 😮 Not to be off-topic…well, not TOO much, but I was watching some vids from WNFJ and found this one video by Eric…G…it’s a German name. Anyway, I practically had to pick my jaw off the f...

Rats… should have asked in the last post…. That verse about “Many are Called but few are Chosen” is used to uphold Limited Atonement, but I’m sure that view is false. I’m just not altogether sure wha...

Dear Cheryl, you just took the words out of my mouth. THANK YOU!!! Problem is, while I was fairly sure that PRIDE had something to do with it, part of me didn’t want to believe it. It’s such a COLD,...

Thanks, Cheryl! You didn’t have to but so glad you did. Otherwise, I’d end up making a hundred posts. Dear woman, you are SO brave to tackle the whole religion of Calvinism. It’s TRAGIC that people e...