Search — Theology Explorer

resurrection miracles Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman's position: even if miracles happened, historians should not believe them

Examination of Bart Ehrman's approach to the resurrection

resurrection miracles William Lane Craig

In his debate with William Lane Craig, Ehrman granted all five ALIVE facts but denied any historian can postulate miracles

Mike describes the Craig-Ehrman debate on the resurrection

resurrection Dan Barker methodological naturalism

Dan Barker's four reasons to reject the resurrection: problem of history, possible natural explanations, internal Bible contradictions, legendary growth

Overview of Barker's case against the resurrection

miracles Dan Barker historical method

Barker's 'problem of history': miracles cannot be established from historical evidence — same Humean presupposition as Ehrman

Mike analyzes Barker's first objection

resurrection Matt Dillahunty methodological naturalism

Dillahunty says he cannot think of any evidence that would convince him the resurrection happened — Mike calls this blind faith skepticism

Dillahunty's response to what evidence would change his mind

resurrection miracles Sam Harris

Sam Harris: no evidence — including multiple contemporaneous eyewitnesses — would be sufficient to establish the resurrection

Examination of Sam Harris's position on miracle claims

resurrection apologetics methodological naturalism

Core pattern across all skeptics: a priori rejection of the resurrection regardless of evidence — Mike calls this blind faith

Synthesis and conclusion of the skeptics analysis section

resurrection William Lane Craig Richard Carrier

The 'they're just Christians' dismissal commits the genetic fallacy — disqualifying scholars by association with their conclusions

Response to Richard Carrier's dismissal of pro-resurrection scholars as biased Christians

resurrection historical method historical Jesus

Denying evidence for Jesus requires denying historical methodology used to establish other historical events

The logical consistency argument for accepting historical evidence for Jesus

Genesis 30:38-40 Genesis 31:1 Miracles Misrepresentation of Scripture Genesis 30:38-40

Genesis 30 striped sticks — the Bible doesn't claim the sticks caused the spotted offspring

Ra claims the Bible teaches that looking at striped sticks will cause a cow to conceive spotted calves, proving biblical scientific ignorance

Isaiah 53 - seed/offspring Suffering Servant Isaiah 53 - seed/offspring New birth / born again

Isaiah 53 'seed/offspring': Ra's internal contradiction — he can't use Israel as both subject and the seed

Ra claims Jesus had no descendants ('seed') as required, and that 'seed' in Isaiah refers to physical offspring of Israel, not Jesus's followers

Psalm 22 Messianic prophecy Psalm 22 David as prophet

Psalm 22: David was not a prophet? Mike rebuts and notes Psalm 22 clearly speaks of future events

Ra argues Psalm 22 is not messianic because (1) David was not a prophet, (2) the Psalms are in the 'writings' section not the 'prophets,' and (3) David never experienced anything like what's described

Apologetics Problem of evil Atheist arguments

Q&A: What is the atheist's best argument against the God of the Bible?

Question from a viewer: what is the most effective atheist argument?

Hosea 11:1 Matthew 2:15 Typology Hosea 11:1 Matthew 2:15

Hosea 11:1 used in Matthew 2:15 — typological fulfillment vs. direct prophecy

Viewer question: how can Hosea 11:1 ('out of Egypt I called my son') be messianic when it is clearly about Israel in context?

Jesus in the Old Testament Ancient rabbinical interpretation Typology

Ancient rabbinical tradition: entire Old Testament is about the Messiah

Continuing discussion of Matthew's typological use of Hosea

Atheist arguments Moral argument for God Logical consistency

Q&A: Can an atheist legitimately argue about a God they don't believe exists?

Viewer question: isn't it a contradiction for an atheist to argue about God using a Bible they don't believe?

Song of Solomon Psalms Proverbs Sermon on the Mount biblical organization anachronism

Reason 1 refuted: Bible organization is not a valid test for inspiration

The skeptic argues the Bible is a 'hopeless mess' that is not well organized and should be arranged by topic (creation, relationships, parenting, prayer, etc.).

inspiration tests 41000 denominations Christian denominations

Reason 3 refuted: The '41,000 interpretations' claim is a sourcing error; difficulty of some passages ≠ general cryptic nature

The skeptic claims the Bible is cryptic and subject to 41,000 different interpretations, citing a Wikipedia article.

James 2 James 2 inspiration tests biblical contradictions

Reason 4 refuted: The psychological power of contradiction lists outweighs their actual evidential force; contradictions would not disprove inspiration anyway

The skeptic links to the Skeptic's Annotated Bible list of hundreds of alleged biblical contradictions.

geographic objection special pleading meme apologetics

The 'God only acts in the Middle East' meme refuted as incoherent special pleading

Between numbered reasons, the article inserts a meme claiming all of God's actions in the Bible occur in a tiny geographic circle around the Middle East, ignoring Europe, the Americas, and Asia.

hermeneutics Trinity biblical clarity

Q&A: Are there essential Christian beliefs that are genuinely hard to understand for non-scholars?

Viewer question about whether ordinary Christians can understand the Bible's core doctrines without academic credentials.

Isaiah Matthew 2:23 fulfilled prophecy Isaiah Matthew 2:23

Q&A: Matthew 2:23 — which prophet foretold Jesus would be called a Nazarene?

Viewer question about a fulfilled prophecy citation in Matthew that has no clear Old Testament source.

preterism full preterism partial preterism

Preterism as one response to the 'failed prophet' problem

Mike introduces preterism as the main alternative to his own futurist interpretation, with no intent to attack preterists.

Mark 13:9-13 Mark 13:9-13 persecution gospel to all nations

Mark 13:9-13 — the disciples' calling is faithful witness unto death, not watching for signs

Mike reads the persecution section of Mark 13 and draws out its theological implication for the disciples' posture.

Luke 21:5-19 Luke 21:5-19 Olivet Discourse Luke delay signal in Luke

Luke 21:5-19 — parallel to Mark 13: delay, persecutions, not-yet signs

Mike moves to Luke 21 and shows the parallel structure confirming the same interpretive logic.

times of the Gentiles Temple Mount Israel 1948

Temple Mount still controlled by non-Jewish Arabs — possible ongoing 'trampling by Gentiles'

Mike applies the 'times of the Gentiles' concept to the contemporary geopolitical situation.

doctrinal triage gospel essentials eschatological humility

Holding eschatological views with appropriate grip: core gospel vs. peripheral doctrines

Mike pauses to address his hermeneutical and pastoral posture toward disagreement on eschatology.

Luke 21:29-36 this generation Luke 21:29-36 fig tree parable Luke

Luke 21:29-36 — 'this generation' in Luke: the generation that sees the signs, not the first century

Mike applies the same interpretive logic to the 'this generation' phrase in Luke as in Mark.

Matthew 24:45-51 Matthew 25:1-13 Matthew 25:14-30 Matthew 24:45-51 Matthew 25:1-13 Matthew 25:14-30

Matthew 24-25 parables all emphasize a long delay before the master returns

Mike identifies a pattern in the four consecutive parables following the Olivet Discourse proper.

Matthew 10:23 Matthew 11:1 Matthew 10:5 contextual interpretation Matthew 10:23 R.C. Sproul

Matthew 10:23 — 'Son of Man coming' refers to Jesus arriving in the towns during the limited sending mission, not the second coming

Mike addresses the specific verse R.C. Sproul cites as evidence for an expected first-century return.

Matthew 16:28 Mark 9:1 Matthew 17 Matthew 16:28 Mark 9:1 Transfiguration

Matthew 16:28 — 'some will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom' fulfilled at the Transfiguration

Mike addresses the final major verse used to support an imminent second-coming expectation.

Bible study methodology R.C. Sproul research process

Q&A: How Mike researches a topic — gather all passages, study independently first, then read disagreeing opinions

Viewer Chris Buckland asks about Mike's research methodology.

1 Thessalonians Christian unity doctrinal triage rapture

Q&A: Division over the rapture — what to disagree about and why Christians shouldn't divide over it

Viewer Joshua Rivera asks about the extent of rapture disagreement.

James 2 salvation James 2 dead faith

Q&A: Is belief in Jesus' death and resurrection sufficient for salvation?

Viewer Adrian asks a basic soteriological question.

Jehovah's Witnesses Witnesses Now for Jesus evangelism to cults

Upcoming event: speaking at 'Witnesses Now for Jesus' West Coast Conference about witnessing to Jehovah's Witnesses

Mike shares an upcoming ministry engagement.

World Mission Society Church of God information control Joo-Cheol Kim

Joo-Cheol Kim is the real architect of modern CoG doctrine — he introduced God the Mother and the Christ claim for Sahng-hong after taking over the group

After Sahng-hong died, Kim separated from Sahng-hong's biological family and took control. Prior to his leadership, neither the God the Mother teaching nor the Christ claim for Sahng-hong existed in the group.

World Mission Society Church of God salvation by works/observance Sabbath

CoG teaches Saturday Sabbath-keeping is required for salvation

Chapter 1 of Kim's book. Page 15 states Sabbath must be kept 'to enter eternal rest.' Page 25 states rejecting the Sabbath brings God's judgment; teaching against it earns hell.

Joo-Cheol Kim Sabbath straw man argument

Kim builds straw men to argue against — e.g., fabricating the objection that Saturday worship is cultish, then refuting it, to avoid real criticism of his actual false teachings

Kim's apologetics section in the Sabbath chapter, around page 47.

law vs. grace Christian liberty Christmas

Even if December 25 had pagan associations, God does not reject sincere worship of Christ offered on that day — the idea that a date determines whether God accepts prayer is biblically baseless

Mike makes the theological argument that the day of worship does not determine its validity before God.

1 Corinthians 11:24-26 Lord's Supper World Mission Society Church of God information control

CoG's 'Passover' is identical to ordinary Christian Communion — the only differences are calling it 'Passover,' requiring women to wear veils, and holding it on a secret date

After two months of research and speaking with former members, Mike determined what CoG actually does at Passover.

World Mission Society Church of God false legitimacy claims argumentation

CoG claims legitimacy from the phrase 'Church of God' appearing in the New Testament — this is a shallow name-based argument that proves nothing

CoG calls itself 'the Church of God' and cites New Testament passages that use that phrase (approximately 5-6 occurrences) as proof of their divine legitimacy.

spiritual recovery discernment cult exit

Practical advice for former CoG members: discard everything Kim taught, start fresh, go deeper in theology and critical thinking, and be suspicious of any teacher who talks to you like a child

The 'hope' section Mike promised at the opening. Directed at former and questioning CoG members.

Joo-Cheol Kim false teachers self-deception

CoG leaders may be self-deceived rather than consciously lying — self-deception is possible and does not eliminate moral culpability

Q&A: question from Tim G about whether CoG leaders know they are deceiving people.

Mike Winger idea 2018-09-05

Criteria for a valid prophecy: Winger accepts Ra's four criteria and adds two more, forming a six-point standard.

Ra articulates what makes a prophecy credible; Winger engages seriously with those criteria rather than dismissing them.

Bible prophecy Aron Ra inspiration of Scripture

Mike Winger idea 2018-09-05

Prophecy has multiple functions: some is short-term (credentialing for contemporaries), some long-term (evidence for distant generations), some purely theological.

Winger extends the criteria discussion to explain why ancient prophets gave both near and far predictions.

hermeneutics Bible prophecy inspiration of Scripture

Mike Winger idea 2018-09-05

Critique of Ra's claim 'anything that can happen will happen given enough time' — this is obviously false and would prove theism if applied consistently.

Ra uses this principle to dismiss prophecies as non-miraculous. Winger shows the principle is neither true nor consistently applied.

apologetics Bible prophecy Aron Ra

Mike Winger presuppositional apologetics debate format

Introduction: Winger critiques presuppositional apologetics, uses Sye Ten Bruggencate as the model, invites Sye to respond live

Opening of the livestream debate; Winger sets the agenda and rules

biblical authority soteriology presuppositional apologetics

Winger argues his objections to presuppositionalism are biblical, not soteriological, and would hold even if he were Calvinist

Winger's clarification before asking Sye to explain presuppositionalism

existence of God presuppositional apologetics epistemic certainty

Sye challenges Winger with the concept of epistemic certainty vs. psychological certainty; presses him on whether God's existence can fail to be true

Sye's Socratic method applied to Winger