Search — Theology Explorer

headship submission definition head-body analogy

What submission DOES mean according to Mike Winger

Mike provides his positive definition of submission.

Ephesians 5:21-24 headship Christ and church analogy Ephesians 5:21-24

Ephesians 5:21-24 -- instructions to wives including headship analogy

Mike teaches through the major passage on marriage.

Ephesians 5:23 Ephesians 5:28 Ephesians 5:23 head-body analogy Ephesians 5:28

Head-body analogy throughout Ephesians 5 reinforces husband's leadership role

Mike traces the head-body metaphor through the passage.

Ephesians 5:31-32 Genesis 2:24 creation order Ephesians 5:31-32 Genesis 2:24

Marriage grounded in creation (Genesis) and salvation (Christ and church), not culture

Mike argues the passage's own grounding prevents culturally-bound interpretations.

Proverbs 31:11-16 Proverbs 31 woman Proverbs 31:11-16 Proverbs 31 woman wife's independence

Proverbs 31 woman as model of wife with real authority and independence

Mike uses Proverbs 31 to show the ideal wife is not micromanaged.

Ephesians 5:31-32 Ephesians 5:31-32 transcultural indicators creation grounding

Ephesians 5 has transcultural indicators, not cultural-bowing indicators

Mike evaluates internal evidence in the passage itself.

Titus 2:5 1 Corinthians 14:34 1 Corinthians 11:3 creation order Titus 2:5 1 Corinthians 14:34

Biblical justifications for wifely submission vs slave obedience are completely different

Mike lists the actual biblical reasons for each and compares them.

Ephesians 5-6 Ephesians 5-6 wives vs slaves comparison slavery objection refutation

Comprehensive list of differences between wives and slaves in Scripture

Mike provides a systematic comparison.

1 Corinthians 11 head coverings 1 Corinthians 11 ancient Roman practices

Preview of next video: head coverings (1 Corinthians 11)

Mike previews the next topic in the series.

2 Kings 11:1-3 Linda Belleville Two Views on Women in Ministry Athaliah

Athaliah: Belleville says she ruled Israel 842-836 BC as a 'head of state' — but reading 2 Kings 11 shows she was a murderous usurper.

Examining Athaliah as an egalitarian example

Esther Esther (book) Esther Mordecai Esther (book)

Esther: a foreign-land example with three issues — she was in a foreign land, followed Mordecai's lead, and had authority only by the king's command.

Examining Esther as an egalitarian example

2 Samuel 14:3 Linda Belleville Two Views on Women in Ministry David

The 'wise woman of Tekoa' (2 Samuel 14) was not an 'advisor to head of state' — she merely memorized and delivered Joab's words to David.

Rebutting Belleville's claim about the woman of Tekoa

2 Samuel 20:16-22 Joab 2 Samuel 20:16-22 wise woman of Abel Beth Maacah

The wise woman of Abel Beth Maacah (2 Samuel 20:16-22) negotiated peace during a siege, representing the whole city — she exercised real political power in crisis.

Examining a more substantive example of a wise woman

Linda Belleville wise woman of Abel Beth Maacah crisis leadership

Belleville calls the wise woman of Abel an 'advisor to heads of state' — but she's not in a regular position; she took authority spontaneously in crisis.

Correcting the characterization while still drawing a lesson

1 Corinthians 11 head coverings 1 Corinthians 11 male-female relationships

Introduction: video goals and scope of head covering debates

Mike introduces the video as an in-depth analysis of 1 Corinthians 11, acknowledging its length but emphasizing timestamps for navigation.

1 Corinthians 11 complementarianism egalitarianism 1 Corinthians 11

Goals: understand major and minor debates, hear points for and against each view

Mike frames the video as part of his Women in Ministry series addressing complementarian vs. egalitarian views.

1 Corinthians 11:2-16 NASB 1 Corinthians 11:2-16

Full reading of 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 without commentary

Mike reads the entire passage from the NASB translation to establish familiarity before analysis.

head coverings interpolation hairstyle view

Overview of the six major interpretive views on 1 Corinthians 11

Mike catalogues the broad claims people make about this passage before detailed analysis.

1 Corinthians 11:10 because of the angels 1 Corinthians 11:10 head covering movement

'Because of the angels' is a peripheral question, not central to understanding the passage

Mike previews that many scholars spend too little time on application and too much on peripheral debates.

testicle theory ancient medicine Troy Martin

Preview of the testicle interpretation of women's hair

Mike warns of adult content and previews a scholarly claim about ancient medical views.

1 Corinthians 11 1 Corinthians 11 methodology

Video format: five interpretive approaches, then 14 questions (central vs. peripheral)

Mike outlines the structure for the remainder of the video.

Traditional interpretation: using NASB over ESV because ESV translates 'woman' as 'wife'

Mike explains his translation choice as the ESV makes interpretive decisions he wants to leave open.

ESV NASB gyne

1 Corinthians 11:3 Ephesians 5:22-24 kephale headship 1 Corinthians 11:3

Traditional view of verse 3: God's divinely given authority structure through headship

Mike presents the traditional interpretation of 1 Corinthians 11:3.

1 Corinthians 15:28 Trinity 1 Corinthians 15:28 eternal subordination

God is the head of Christ: 1 Corinthians 15:28 and the Son's submission to the Father

Mike addresses how God being the head of Christ supports the headship chain.

1 Corinthians 11:3 head coverings male headship 1 Corinthians 11:3

Verse 3 as the overarching principle: head covering reinforces male headship

Mike explains how verse 3 functions as the foundation for the entire passage.

1 Corinthians 11:4-5 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 toga palla

Cloth coverings in first-century context: toga and palla

Mike describes the actual garments involved in head covering practices.

1 Corinthians 11:4 1 Corinthians 11:4 men's head coverings interpretive methodology

Critical neglected point: Paul cares about men NOT wearing head coverings

Mike identifies a frequently overlooked element of the passage.

1 Corinthians 14 1 Corinthians 14 headship symbolism women praying and prophesying

Head coverings relate to headship: who has a human head vs. Christ as head

Mike explains the symbolic logic of the traditional view.

women in early church Greco-Roman context Jewish context

Women's participation in early church was countercultural but distinctly Christian

Mike discusses the contrast with Jewish and Greco-Roman culture.

1 Corinthians 11:5-6 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 shaving analogy argument from shame

Paul's first argument: shaving analogy (verses 5-6)

Mike identifies five distinct arguments Paul makes to support head coverings.

1 Corinthians 11:5-6 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 analogy argument cultural distance

Hair as a natural covering extends to cloth covering: Paul's analogical reasoning

Mike explains how Paul connects natural hair covering to cloth covering.

Genesis 2 1 Corinthians 11:7-10 creation order primogeniture Genesis 2

Paul's second argument: creation order supports head covering (verses 7-10)

Mike identifies the creation-based argument for head coverings.

1 Corinthians 11:8-9 Genesis 2:18 creation order ezer 1 Corinthians 11:8-9

Two principles in verses 8-9: who came from who (order) and who was made for who (purpose)

Mike distinguishes two separate arguments Paul derives from Genesis 2.

1 Corinthians 11:9 egalitarian scholarship 1 Corinthians 11:9 scholarly critique

Egalitarian scholars consistently ignore verse 9 of 1 Corinthians 11

Mike critiques the egalitarian handling of this passage.

1 Corinthians 11:7 Genesis 1:26-27 adam 1 Corinthians 11:7 Genesis 1:26-27

Does verse 7 imply women are not in God's image? No -- Genesis 1 clearly affirms both are

Mike addresses whether the passage teaches women are not in God's image.

Galatians 3:28 Romans 8 creation order complementarianism image of God

Two relationships: humans to creation (equal) vs. humans to each other (different roles)

Mike provides the framework for understanding how image and role differences coexist.

1 Corinthians 11:10 because of the angels 1 Corinthians 11:10 angelic observers

Paul's third argument: 'because of the angels' (verse 10)

Mike briefly introduces this peripheral but hotly debated phrase.

Ephesians 5 1 Peter 3 1 Corinthians 11:11-12 Ephesians 5 1 Peter 3 1 Corinthians 11:11-12

Verses 11-12: mutual dependence balances headship -- not refutation but nuance

Mike explains the 'however' of verses 11-12 in the traditional view.

1 Corinthians 11:13-15 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 physis nature argument

Paul's fourth argument: nature gives women long hair as a covering (verses 13-15)

Mike explains the argument from nature for head coverings.

1 Corinthians 11:16 1 Corinthians 11:16 universal church practice Roman Catholic

Paul's fifth argument: universal church custom (verse 16)

Mike explains the appeal to all churches practicing head coverings.

Philip Payne kephale source meaning

The hairstyle view: Philip Payne's interpretation of 1 Corinthians 11

Mike presents the second of five interpretive approaches.

Payne's view: 'glory of God' and 'glory of man' have different meanings for men vs. women

Mike critiques Payne's inconsistent interpretation of 'glory.'

Philip Payne doxa glory

1 Corinthians 11:9 Philip Payne internal contradiction 1 Corinthians 11:9

Payne's view of verse 9: 'woman made for man' only means sexual partnership

Mike further critiques the sexual-partner interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:10 Philip Payne 1 Corinthians 11:10 exousia

Payne on verse 10: the woman has authority (exousia), not under authority

Mike presents Payne's egalitarian reading of the authority verse.

1 Corinthians 11:11-12 Philip Payne egalitarianism 1 Corinthians 11:11-12

Payne on verses 11-12: Paul repudiates hierarchy of man over woman

Mike presents how Payne makes the passage actively egalitarian.

1 Corinthians 11:15 Philip Payne 1 Corinthians 11:15 peribolaion

Payne's pivotal claim: verse 15 shows hair done up IS the covering (not analogy)

Mike explains Payne's hinge interpretation of verse 15.

Philip Payne inconsistent interpretation katakalupto

Payne interprets the same Greek word differently for men vs. women

Mike identifies an inconsistency in Payne's interpretation of 'covering.'