Search — Theology Explorer

headship submission definition head-body analogy

What submission DOES mean according to Mike Winger

Mike provides his positive definition of submission.

Galatians 3:28 1 Peter 3:7 Galatians 3:28 1 Peter 3:7 equal inheritance in Christ

Wife as precious vessel and co-heir -- equal inheritance in Christ

Mike explains the vessel analogy and spiritual equality.

Ephesians 5:21-24 headship Christ and church analogy Ephesians 5:21-24

Ephesians 5:21-24 -- instructions to wives including headship analogy

Mike teaches through the major passage on marriage.

Ephesians 5:23 Ephesians 5:28 Ephesians 5:23 head-body analogy Ephesians 5:28

Head-body analogy throughout Ephesians 5 reinforces husband's leadership role

Mike traces the head-body metaphor through the passage.

Ephesians 5:23-25 Christ and church analogy Jesus' authority Ephesians 5:23-25

The Christ-church analogy strengthens rather than undermines submission

Mike argues the Christ parallel destroys the mutual submission reading.

Craig Keener slavery objection logic same principles test

The slavery objection's logic: same reasons for submission = same rules apply

Mike explains the logical structure of the slavery objection.

Titus 2:5 1 Corinthians 14:34 1 Corinthians 11:3 creation order Titus 2:5 1 Corinthians 14:34

Biblical justifications for wifely submission vs slave obedience are completely different

Mike lists the actual biblical reasons for each and compares them.

Mike Winger idea 2022-03-28

The physical strength difference between men and women may explain the absence of female military leaders — an analogy to firefighter standards.

Practical consideration for military leadership

military leadership physical strength firefighter standards

1 Corinthians 11:5-6 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 shaving analogy argument from shame

Paul's first argument: shaving analogy (verses 5-6)

Mike identifies five distinct arguments Paul makes to support head coverings.

1 Corinthians 11:5-6 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 analogy argument cultural distance

Hair as a natural covering extends to cloth covering: Paul's analogical reasoning

Mike explains how Paul connects natural hair covering to cloth covering.

1 Corinthians 11:15 Philip Payne 1 Corinthians 11:15 peribolaion

Payne's pivotal claim: verse 15 shows hair done up IS the covering (not analogy)

Mike explains Payne's hinge interpretation of verse 15.

Philip Payne peribolaion Alan Padgett

Alan Padgett and Philip Payne: even with equivalence, hair replaces cloth covering

Mike examines the revised arguments of hair-up proponents.

1 Corinthians 11:5-6 1 Corinthians 11:15 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 analogy argument 1 Corinthians 11:15

Why verse 15 is an analogy: four reasons supporting the traditional cloth covering view

Mike builds his case that Paul is making an analogy, not an identification.

peribolaion Preston Massie testicle theory refuted

How the testicle view does NOT fit 1 Corinthians 11: five additional problems

Mike presents his own challenges to the view from the passage itself.

German scholarship Gospel origins anti-Semitism in scholarship

Analogy to overturned German scholarship on the Gospels and Greek myths

Mike argues that entire schools of scholarly thought can be wrong and get overturned.

image of God sons of God inviolable status

Pillar 3: Women's status as image bearers and sons of God is inviolable

Mike introduces the critical third pillar that prevents abuse.

soft complementarianism patriarchalism application spectrum

The big question: how far do we draw the application beyond marriage and eldership?

Mike frames the central application question of the video.

Pharisees Sabbath analogy fence around the Torah

Pharisee fence analogy: how far do we extend rules about gender roles?

Mike uses the Pharisees' approach to Sabbath rules as an analogy.

Deborah women voting Pharisee analogy

Women voting: no biblical case for restricting it

Mike addresses whether women should be allowed to vote.

transgender athletes Serena Williams sexual dimorphism

Sports analogy: men and women are fundamentally different and not interchangeable

Mike uses sports examples to illustrate fundamental male-female differences.

John Piper John Piper Deborah submission to all men

Women do NOT need to submit to all men — only their husbands

Mike rejects the idea of general female submission to all males.

Mike Winger idea 2023-11-22

View 3: Women saved spiritually by literally having children

Mike evaluates and rejects the view that bearing children contributes to women's spiritual salvation.

1 Corinthians 7 1 Timothy 2:15 Romans 3:28 1 Corinthians 7 justification by faith 1 Timothy 2:15

Mike Winger idea 2018-02-21

Logical inconsistency: Watchtower permits organ transplants but forbids blood transfusions, despite using the same 'eating equals IV injection' logic to condemn both.

Mike exposes the self-refuting nature of the Watchtower's 'IV equals eating' argument.

Watchtower doctrinal hypocrisy organ transplant doctrine

Mike Winger idea 2017-12-27

Restaurant rescue shows as an illustration of blind spots to one's own problems

Illustrative analogy within Tip 3 about honest self-assessment.

self-deception self-examination blind spots

Mike Winger idea 2018-03-14

James 2:15-16 — the man who tells the needy 'go, be warm and filled' without helping; a parallel to dead faith

Analyzing the illustration James gives in vv.15-16

James 2:15-16 dead faith ophelos James 2:15-16

Mike Winger idea 2018-03-14

James 2:26 — 'faith apart from works is dead' — the body/spirit analogy shows two kinds of faith, not faith vs. works for salvation

Verse-by-verse analysis of James 2:26

James 2:26 dead faith living faith James 2:26

1 Corinthians 3:4-15 Paul Apollos works

Reading of 1 Corinthians 3:4-15

Scripture reading of the first key passage

1 Corinthians 3:9-10 hermeneutics Paul ministry

Transition from planting/watering analogy to building analogy in 1 Corinthians 3:9-10

Structural analysis of the passage's two analogies

1 Corinthians 3:15 hermeneutics salvation purgatory

'Saved as through fire' is an idiom/analogy, not a description of a purifying fire experience

Addressing the specific phrase Catholics emphasize in v. 15

eisegesis Catholic Answers idolatry

Catholic apologetic response: the amulets were 'lucky charms' not idolatrous — Jimmy Akin's baseball sock analogy

Catholic attempt to neutralize the mortal sin problem in 2 Maccabees

Mike Winger idea 2018-09-05

The 'never be rebuilt' clause: Phoenician Tyre was permanently destroyed. What replaced it was a Greek city under Alexander — a new foundation, new population, new identity — not a restoration.

This is the most debated element of the Tyre prophecy; Winger addresses it with historical citations.

Ezekiel 26 apologetics Bible prophecy Ezekiel 26

Romans 1 sin general revelation Romans 1

Winger argues Romans 1 teaches that people have been given sufficient information but may not currently believe it, because sin causes suppression and exchange of truth

Winger's counter-reading of Romans 1

Romans 8 Ephesians 2:8-9 Romans 8 Ephesians 2:8-9 Calvinism

Soteriology enters: Sye argues if a person contributes anything to their salvation (including the choice of faith), salvation becomes a work; leads into the faith-as-a-gift debate

Sye introduces Calvinist soteriology as the foundation for the apologetic difference

Romans 1 general revelation Romans 1 suppression of truth

The beachball analogy: you cannot suppress what you don't already hold; Sye uses this to prove people must have truth to suppress it

Sye's illustration for the suppression of truth in Romans 1

Matthew 25 Calvinism sheep and goats divine election

Sheep and goats: Sye challenges Winger to find one verse that says goats become sheep; argues the analogy is consistent with Calvinist election — goats are always goats from God's perspective

Audience question from a viewer challenging Calvinist sheep/goats distinction