Search — Theology Explorer

1 Corinthians 11:4 1 Corinthians 11:4 men's head coverings interpretive methodology

Critical neglected point: Paul cares about men NOT wearing head coverings

Mike identifies a frequently overlooked element of the passage.

1 Corinthians 14 1 Corinthians 14 headship symbolism women praying and prophesying

Head coverings relate to headship: who has a human head vs. Christ as head

Mike explains the symbolic logic of the traditional view.

1 Corinthians 11:8-9 Genesis 2:18 creation order ezer 1 Corinthians 11:8-9

Two principles in verses 8-9: who came from who (order) and who was made for who (purpose)

Mike distinguishes two separate arguments Paul derives from Genesis 2.

1 Corinthians 11:9 egalitarian scholarship 1 Corinthians 11:9 scholarly critique

Egalitarian scholars consistently ignore verse 9 of 1 Corinthians 11

Mike critiques the egalitarian handling of this passage.

Philip Payne kephale source meaning

The hairstyle view: Philip Payne's interpretation of 1 Corinthians 11

Mike presents the second of five interpretive approaches.

Payne's view: 'glory of God' and 'glory of man' have different meanings for men vs. women

Mike critiques Payne's inconsistent interpretation of 'glory.'

Philip Payne doxa glory

1 Corinthians 11:9 Philip Payne internal contradiction 1 Corinthians 11:9

Payne's view of verse 9: 'woman made for man' only means sexual partnership

Mike further critiques the sexual-partner interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:15 Philip Payne 1 Corinthians 11:15 peribolaion

Payne's pivotal claim: verse 15 shows hair done up IS the covering (not analogy)

Mike explains Payne's hinge interpretation of verse 15.

Philip Payne inconsistent interpretation katakalupto

Payne interprets the same Greek word differently for men vs. women

Mike identifies an inconsistency in Payne's interpretation of 'covering.'

Ephesians 5 1 Corinthians 11:11-12 Philip Payne kephale Ephesians 5

Push back on kephale as 'source': even if source, it still implies authority; verses 11-12 prove too much

Mike addresses two independent problems with the source interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:15 Philip Payne 1 Corinthians 11:15 logical flow

Payne's view causes the passage to lose logical flow

Mike shows structural problems with the hair-up interpretation.

men's head coverings katakalupto hair-up view

Three reasons the Greek pushes against the hair-done-up view

Mike summarizes the Greek evidence against the hairstyle interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:6-7 Philip Payne inconsistent interpretation katakalupto

Philip Payne interprets katakalupto differently for men vs. women -- same word, contradictory meanings

Mike delivers what he considers a decisive critique of the hair-up view.

Genesis 2 1 Corinthians 11:8-9 creation order Genesis 2 1 Corinthians 11:8-9

Question 7: What is Paul's point about creation order and purpose in verses 8-9?

Mike addresses the most decisive question for the complementarian/egalitarian debate.

1 Corinthians 11:9 Philip Payne internal contradiction 1 Corinthians 11:9

Payne on verse 9: 'woman made for man' means sexual partnership -- creates a contradiction

Mike examines and refutes Payne's interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:9 1 Corinthians 11:9 Gordon Fee necessity interpretation

Gordon Fee on verse 9: woman is 'necessary for man' to fulfill his calling -- also creates contradiction

Mike examines and refutes Fee's interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:9 1 Corinthians 11:11 1 Corinthians 11:9 1 Corinthians 11:11 egalitarian failure

Verse 9 is the weak spot for egalitarianism: no decent interpretation exists

Mike draws his conclusion on the decisive question.

Craig Keener doxa inconsistent interpretation

Egalitarian interpretations of 'glory' all use two different meanings for the same word

Mike critiques egalitarian inconsistency with the term doxa.

Philip Payne doxa inconsistent interpretation

Philip Payne's view of 'glory' also fails: man is God's glory means not-woman; woman is man's glory means sexual partner

Mike examines and refutes Payne's handling of glory.

1 Corinthians 11:15 Tom Schreiner doxa 1 Corinthians 11:15

Tom Schreiner's consistent interpretation of glory as 'honor' works for both uses

Mike presents what he considers the best interpretation of glory.

honor chain headship chain Gospel of John

Glory as honor connects the entire passage: headship chain produces honor chain

Mike shows how the honor interpretation unifies the passage.

1 Corinthians 11:10 1 Corinthians 11:10 exousia kalumma

Early textual variant substitutes 'covering' (kalumma) for 'authority' (exousia) in verse 10

Mike provides additional evidence from manuscript tradition.

1 Corinthians 11:10 1 Corinthians 11:10 angelic observers worship context

Mike's preferred view: holy angelic observers who delight in seeing God's order in worship

Mike presents his conclusion on the angels question.

Mark Goodacre testicle theory Troy Martin peribolaion

Question 13: The testicle theory -- Troy Martin's claim about peribolaion

Mike introduces the most controversial recent interpretation.

peribolaion Preston Massie testicle theory refuted

How the testicle view does NOT fit 1 Corinthians 11: five additional problems

Mike presents his own challenges to the view from the passage itself.

complementarianism utter silence view women's speech in church

Introduction of View 4: The Utter Silence View

Mike introduces the most strict complementarian view, which limits women from nearly all public speech in church.

complementarianism judging prophecy view testing prophecy

Introduction of View 5: The Judging Prophecy View (Mike's own view)

Mike introduces his preferred interpretation, which limits the silence command specifically to the testing/judging of prophecy.

Bruce Metzger scribal alteration

Bruce Metzger's explanation for the manuscript displacement

Mike quotes Metzger's view that the relocation was a scribal attempt to improve the passage's flow.

Genesis 2 1 Corinthians 11:8-10 Genesis 2 Gordon Fee Pauline style

Pauline style argument for the refutation view: three points that fail

Mike addresses three ways proponents claim Paul would not have said what is in verses 34-35.

Craig Keener Paul, Women and Wives education view

Craig Keener's version of the education view

Mike presents Craig Keener's more balanced version of the education interpretation.

education view reread test

The education view fails the 'reread test'

Mike summarizes why the education view ultimately does not work.

Beth Allison Barr Craig Keener judging prophecy view

Five possible interpretations of what kind of silence is meant in verse 34

Mike lists the options for what specific type of silence verse 34 commands.

Joel 2 Acts 2:15-18 Joel 2 women prophesying Acts 2:15-18

Acts 2 and the Joel prophecy: men and women prophesied publicly at Pentecost

Mike cites Acts 2 as scriptural evidence against the utter silence view.

judging prophecy view argumentative wedge strategy

Warning against using the utter silence view's failures as a wedge for other weak views

Mike warns that some use the utter silence view's problems to justify weaker egalitarian interpretations.

church authority judging prophecy view testing prophecy

View 5 analysis: The Judging Prophecy View -- Mike's preferred interpretation

Mike presents the increasingly common complementarian view that the passage restricts women from judging/testing prophecy.

submission Anthony Thiselton marriage authority

The scenario of a wife judging her husband's prophecy illustrates the authority problem

Mike illustrates why judging prophecy creates a specific submission/authority issue.

1 John 4:1 1 Corinthians 12:10 1 John 4:1 testing prophecy 1 Corinthians 12:10

Judging Prophecy Hinge 1: Was testing prophecy a real practice in the early church?

Mike establishes that testing/judging prophecy was indeed a regular church practice.

1 Corinthians 14:29 1 Corinthians 14:6-28 1 Corinthians 14:29 1 Corinthians 14:6-28 structural parallel

Judging Prophecy Hinge 2: The passage's structure mirrors tongues/interpretation with prophecy/judging

Mike shows how 1 Corinthians 14's structure supports the judging prophecy view.

1 Corinthians 12:10 1 Corinthians 14:1 1 Corinthians 14:39 1 Corinthians 12:10 1 Corinthians 14:1 1 Corinthians 14:39

Problems with the 'other prophets judge prophecy' view

Mike argues against the interpretation that only other prophets test prophecy.

1 Corinthians 14 context women teaching view 1 Corinthians 14 context

Brief refutation of the 'women as teachers' interpretation

Mike quickly dismisses the view that 'keep silent' refers to women teaching.

Proverbs 3:5-6 Psalm 119 (delight in God's word) biblical submission Proverbs 3:5-6 Psalm 119 (delight in God's word)

Conclusion 3: Christians must not despise what God commands about gender roles

Mike calls Christians to celebrate rather than resist biblical teachings on gender roles.

scholarly methodology egalitarian arguments historical reconstruction

What surprised Mike most: how bad egalitarian arguments are

Mike shares his biggest surprise from the research project.

Genesis 3:16 1 Timothy 2:12 Genesis 3:16 1 Timothy 2:12 egalitarian arguments

Specific examples of bad egalitarian arguments

Mike lists specific egalitarian interpretive strategies he found unconvincing.

German scholarship Gospel origins anti-Semitism in scholarship

Analogy to overturned German scholarship on the Gospels and Greek myths

Mike argues that entire schools of scholarly thought can be wrong and get overturned.

secondary issue Christian unity practical application

Women in ministry is a secondary issue but with huge practical application

Mike addresses the importance level of this theological disagreement.

Genesis 3:16 Genesis 3:16 the fall post-fall difficulty

Genesis 3: Marriage roles affirmed with increased difficulty post-fall, not introduced

Mike addresses Genesis 3:16 and the fall's effect on marriage roles.

1 Timothy 2:11-14 creation order complementarianism eldership

Basic complementarian reading of the passage

Mike presents the straightforward complementarian interpretation before addressing egalitarian challenges.

1 Timothy 2:12-14 creation order 1 Timothy 2:12-14 false teaching interpretation

If Paul meant false teaching, the passage becomes absurd

Mike shows the logical problems with reading 'false teaching' into didasko in 1 Tim 2:12.

Genesis 2 1 Corinthians 11:8-9 1 Timothy 2:13 creation order Genesis 2 1 Corinthians 11:8-9

Adam and Eve appeal: creation order argument (1 Tim 2:13)

Mike examines Paul's use of 'For Adam was formed first, then Eve' as the basis for his restriction.