Search — Theology Explorer

Genesis 1-3 Genesis 1-3 pre-fall role differences extra-biblical assumptions

Series recap: Videos 1-2 summary

Mike reviews the previous videos in the Women in Ministry series.

eldership sonship status marriage submission

The whole debate hinges on how far 'sonship status' can be stretched

Mike identifies the crux of the disagreement.

Ephesians 5 marriage submission inheritance practices Ephesians 5

Did NT Christians still practice primogeniture? Wives submitting to husbands?

Mike tests the egalitarian logic against practical NT realities.

1 Peter 3:1-7 1 Peter 3:1-7 Sarah Abraham

1 Peter 3 proves full heirship status with continued role distinctions

Mike uses 1 Peter 3 as a decisive counter-example to the egalitarian reading.

1 Corinthians 11 Ephesians 5 1 Corinthians 11 Ephesians 5 contextual argument

Bible study argument introduced: Paul's context in 1 Corinthians 11 and Ephesians does not imply authority

Mike introduces the third egalitarian argument — the contextual/exegetical claim.

Ephesians 5:22-24 submission mutual submission Ronald Pierce

Pierce and Groothuis strangely ignore Ephesians 5:22-24, which explicitly links headship with submission

Mike points out that egalitarian authors skip the most relevant passage.

Ephesians 5:22-24 submission Ephesians 5:22-24 hupotasso

Ephesians 5:22-24 explicitly uses 'submit' and 'be subject to' in the context of headship

Mike reads the full Ephesians 5 passage that egalitarians skip.

Ephesians 5:21 mutual submission Ephesians 5:21 household codes

Egalitarian rescue: 'mutual submission' from Ephesians 5:21 — to be addressed in the next video

Mike previews the mutual submission argument he will tackle later.

kephale semantic range metaphorical meanings

Metaphorical meanings of kephale: literal, headlong, whole person, extremity, prominent part, conclusion, authority

Mike catalogs all the possible metaphorical meanings of kephale.

submission to Scripture cultural pressure closing prayer

Closing prayer: submission to God's word on marriage and church roles regardless of cultural pressure

Mike closes with prayer emphasizing trust in Scripture above cultural norms.

egalitarianism mutual submission cultural accommodation

Three main egalitarian arguments against husband authority in marriage

Mike outlines the egalitarian case before presenting his own view.

submission definition hypotasso

What submission does NOT mean: clarifying common misunderstandings

Mike preemptively addresses caricatures of the complementarian position on submission.

headship submission definition head-body analogy

What submission DOES mean according to Mike Winger

Mike provides his positive definition of submission.

1 Peter 3:1-7 1 Peter 3:1-7 hypotasso ESV translation

Teaching through 1 Peter 3:1-7 - wives told to be subject to husbands

Mike reads and begins teaching through the first main passage.

1 Peter 3:1 1 Peter 3:1 evangelism Lee Strobel

Submission in 1 Peter is not exclusively for evangelism of unsaved husbands

Mike argues against reducing wifely submission to an evangelism strategy.

1 Peter 3:3-5 1 Peter 3:3-5 gentle and quiet spirit holy women of old

Submission as character quality, not just cultural convenience

Mike draws out additional reasons from 1 Peter 3 that submission is about inner character.

1 Peter 3:5-6 Genesis 18:12 Sarah Abraham 1 Peter 3:5-6

Sarah obeying Abraham as an example that rules out purely evangelistic interpretation

Mike argues the Sarah example confirms submission is a general godly pattern, not culturally bound.

Sarah obedience in marriage Western individualism

Submission involves a 'sense of obeying' but not micromanagement obedience

Mike nuances what Sarah's obedience looked like practically.

1 Peter 3:1 patriarchalism 1 Peter 3:1 scope of submission

Submission is limited to 'your own husband,' not all men

Mike distinguishes complementarianism from patriarchalism.

1 Peter 3:7 weaker vessel 1 Peter 3:7 co-heirs

1 Peter 3:7 -- Instructions to husbands: understanding, honor, and equal inheritance

Mike presents the husband's obligations that balance the wife's submission.

Colossians 3:18-19 hypotasso Colossians 3:18-19 as is fitting in the Lord

Colossians 3:18-19 -- wives submit, husbands love and don't be harsh

Mike teaches through the second main passage.

Titus 2:5 Titus 2:5 training younger women word of God not reviled

Titus 2:5 -- older women to train younger women to be submissive to husbands

Mike covers the first supplemental passage.

Ephesians 5:21-24 headship Christ and church analogy Ephesians 5:21-24

Ephesians 5:21-24 -- instructions to wives including headship analogy

Mike teaches through the major passage on marriage.

1 Corinthians 7 Proverbs 1:8 1 Corinthians 7 wife's authority Proverbs 1:8

Wife has real authority: over home, children, and can make demands on husband

Mike addresses whether complementarianism denies all authority to the wife.

1 Samuel 25 limits of submission Abigail 1 Samuel 25

Can a wife reject her husband's decisions? Yes, in certain situations

Mike addresses limits of wifely submission.

husband's authority limits Jesus on divorce women's religious education

Conclusions: husband's authority is real but limited compared to cultural expectations

Mike draws broader conclusions before the egalitarian rebuttal section.

1 Timothy 3:4-5 mutually exclusive callings abuse prevention 1 Timothy 3:4-5

Callings are mutually exclusive: husband never told to MAKE wife submit

Mike identifies a key structural feature of the NT marriage instructions.

1 Peter 3:1-7 Discovering Biblical Equality 1 Peter 3:1-7 Peter Davids

Peter Davids' egalitarian view of 1 Peter 3: submission is only for evangelism

Mike begins the egalitarian rebuttal section with Peter Davids from 'Discovering Biblical Equality.'

Genesis 18:12 Sarah Genesis 18:12 Peter Davids

Davids claims Peter references the Testament of Abraham, not Genesis, for Sarah

Mike examines and refutes Davids' argument about the Sarah reference.

Genesis 21:12 Genesis 16:2 Craig Keener Genesis 21:12 Genesis 16:2

Craig Keener's addition: Abraham also 'obeys' Sarah (Genesis 16:2, 21:12)

Mike examines Keener's argument for mutual submission in the Abraham-Sarah relationship.

Colossians 3:18-19 servant leadership Colossians 3:18-19

Complementarian reading: Paul affirms authority but with Jesus-like caveats

Mike offers the alternative complementarian reading of Colossians 3.

2 Corinthians 13:10 2 Corinthians 13:10 restrained authority godly authority

Paul's own practice of restrained authority as a model (2 Corinthians 13:10)

Mike draws a parallel from Paul's apostolic practice.

Colossians 3:18 argument from silence Colossians 3:18

Alternative egalitarian argument from silence on Colossians rejected

Mike briefly addresses the view that Paul only commanded submission in certain cultural contexts.

Ephesians 5 mutual submission Craig Keener Ephesians 5

Keener's two-pillar case: mutual submission and cultural bowing

Mike summarizes the foundation of Keener's interpretation of Ephesians 5.

Ephesians 5 Craig Keener Ephesians 5 dual messaging theory

Internal vs external messaging theory: Paul supposedly wrote differently for Romans vs Christians

Mike explains the most provocative aspect of Keener's theory.

Craig Keener Paul, Women and Wives Paul's imprisonment

Keener's conclusion: Paul wrote household codes as long-range Roman cultural defense

Mike quotes Keener's concluding summary on the cultural argument.

Ephesians 5:21 mutual submission Ephesians 5:21 dual messaging

Egalitarian interpretation of Ephesians 5:21 as umbrella of mutual submission

Mike explains and critiques the mutual submission reading of verse 21.

Ephesians 5:21-22 Craig Keener Ephesians 5:21-22 husband's submission

Keener and egalitarians find husband's submission in two places

Mike identifies where egalitarians claim to find the husband submitting.

Ephesians 5:21 1 Timothy 3:4-5 Ephesians 6:1-9 mutual submission Ephesians 5:21 household codes

Mutual submission fails when applied consistently to all three household code groups

Mike's main argument against the mutual submission interpretation.

Ephesians 5:23-25 Christ and church analogy Jesus' authority Ephesians 5:23-25

The Christ-church analogy strengthens rather than undermines submission

Mike argues the Christ parallel destroys the mutual submission reading.

Ephesians 5:21-22 Craig Keener hypotasso Ephesians 5:21-22

Keener on verb borrowing: verse 22 borrows 'submit' from verse 21

Mike examines a grammatical argument about the Greek text.

Craig Keener redefinition of submit love as submission

Keener redefines 'submit' to mean self-sacrificial service

Mike critiques Keener's redefinition of submission.

Ephesians 5:33 Craig Keener hypotasso Ephesians 5:33

Keener redefines wife's submission as 'only respect' based on Ephesians 5:33

Mike critiques a second redefinition of key terminology.

Ephesians 5 Craig Keener Ephesians 5 space devoted to instructions

Paul devotes more space to husbands loving than wives submitting -- what does this mean?

Mike evaluates the significance of the imbalanced space given to each instruction.

Titus 2:3-10 Titus 2:3-10 imbalanced instructions careful balancing theory

Titus 2:3-10 refutes the 'careful balancing act' theory about Ephesians 5

Mike uses Titus 2 to show Paul doesn't always balance instructions to both sexes.

Titus 2:9 Titus 3:1 hypotasso Titus 2:9 Titus 3:1

Paul uses hypotasso for bond servants and rulers with clear obedience meaning

Mike shows Paul's consistent usage of the word submit across contexts.