Search — Theology Explorer

Tom Schreiner Phyllis Trible qara

Schreiner's response to Trible: demanding both 'call' and 'name' is too rigid; the repetition of 'qara' (call) in Gen 2:19-23 links animal naming to Eve's naming.

Complementarian rebuttal on naming formula

Tom Schreiner Gen 2:23 Phyllis Trible

Trible's second objection: 'woman' is a common noun (gender classification), not a proper name -- Schreiner's reply: Adam classified animals the same way (types, not personal names).

Complementarian rebuttal on naming as classification

Gen 2 false dichotomy naming as authority

Mike's four problems with Ramsey's paper: (1) ignores Genesis 1-2 context, (2) confuses WHY a name was chosen with WHY Adam does the naming, (3) argues against magical naming instead of actual complementarian claims, (4) ignores that namers consistently have authority over the named.

Critique of Ramsey's paper on naming

Philip Payne Man and Woman, One in Christ Gen 2:18-20

Payne's final pushback on naming: the primary message of Gen 2:18-20 is that no animal is a suitable partner, not that Adam names things; and Adam is passive during Eve's creation.

Payne's attempt to minimize the naming significance

Gen 3:16 the fall Gen 3:1-20

Reading of Genesis 3:1-20 covering the serpent's temptation, the fall, God confronting Adam first, the curses on serpent/woman/man, and the proto-evangelium.

Genesis 3 text reading

Tom Schreiner 1 Tim 2:14 Eve's deception

Schreiner appeals to 1 Timothy 2:14 ('Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived') to support point 5 -- Mike thinks the verse can be explained without the subversion-of-authority reading.

NT support for serpent-targeting-Eve argument

Philip Payne Man and Woman, One in Christ Gen 3

Mike's critique of Payne's chiasm: it's overly complex (A-B-C-D-E-F-E-D-C-B-A), doesn't feel natural, and even if valid, doesn't negate the authority implications.

Rebuttal to Payne's chiastic structure argument

bad complementarian arguments Gen 3:17 listening to wife

Bad complementarian argument #2: Adam's sin was 'listening to his wife' -- Mike refutes this; the problem was the content (eating the fruit), not the act of listening to a woman.

Bad complementarian arguments

Linda Belleville Gen 3:16 sexual desire interpretation

Mike's critique of Belleville's sexual desire interpretation: it doesn't describe a recognizable perennial problem for women and doesn't feel like a curse.

Problems with the sexual desire interpretation

Linda Belleville Gen 3:16 Craig Blomberg

Belleville's interpretation #2: translate 'he shall rule' as 'it shall rule' (neuter) -- the woman's own desire will rule over her, removing the husband's authority entirely.

Belleville's alternative translation of Gen 3:16

Song 7:10 Gen 3:16 teshukah Gen 4:7

Analysis of 'teshukah' (desire): lexicons show it could mean sexual desire or desire to dominate; it appears only 3 times in the OT.

Hebrew word study on 'desire' in Gen 3:16

Song 7:10 Gen 3:16 Gen 4:7 Song 7:10

NET Bible note supports the control interpretation: Gen 3:16 announces a power struggle where the woman desires to control the man but the man will dominate her instead.

Scholarly support for the control/conflict interpretation

Gen 3:16 curse vs. prescription description vs. prescription

Mike's conclusion on Gen 3:16: Eve's desire is to rule/control her husband, but the husband will rule over her -- this is NOT a healthy or ideal situation; it's a description of the fall's consequences.

Mike's interpretation of Genesis 3:16

Gen 3:16 Gen 2 post-fall conflict

Mike's view: before the fall there was harmonious, tensionless leadership; now the curse introduces conflict -- the solution is alleviating abuse, not eliminating the nature of authority.

Mike's synthesis of Genesis 2-3 on authority

Eph 5 voluntary submission self-sacrificial love

Ephesians 5 as the solution to the curse: self-sacrificial love from husband, voluntary submission from wife, both acting in service to God.

NT solution to the Genesis 3 curse dynamic

Romans 16 Junia women apostles Mary Magdalene

NT Wright's egalitarian argument: women as apostles to the apostles

Mike plays a clip from NT Wright presenting the egalitarian case for women leaders.

Romans 16 Romans 16:1-2 Junia N.T. Wright Romans 16

NT Wright on Romans 16: women as church leaders and Phoebe as letter bearer

Continuation of Wright's argument about Romans 16.

Romans 16:1-2 Linda Belleville Discovering Biblical Equality Two Views on Women in Ministry

Linda Belleville's claim: no lack of women leaders in the early church

Mike introduces egalitarian scholar Linda Belleville's claims about women leaders.

Colossians 4:15 Discovering Biblical Equality Nympha Lynn Cohick

Nympha in Colossians 4:15 -- Lynn Cohick's claim she led a house church

Mike begins examining individual women named in the NT, starting with Nympha.

Linda Belleville hosting vs. leading overseer

Central egalitarian claim: hosting a house church made you the leader/overseer of that church

Mike identifies this as a pervasive claim that recurs throughout egalitarian literature.

Priscilla women teaching men private instruction

Principle from Priscilla: a woman can instruct a man in doctrine, at least in private/informal contexts

Mike draws a principle from the Priscilla account.

pastor vs. elder vs. deacon church terminology

The term 'pastor' is used in confusing ways; may describe deacon-level work

Mike distinguishes between the biblical office and modern church usage.

1 Timothy 3 Ephesus Priscilla Timothy

1 Timothy 3 cannot be explained by women lacking education -- Priscilla was in Ephesus

Mike preempts common egalitarian responses.

Philip Payne prostatis LSJ lexicon

LSJ vs. BDAG on prostatis: wrong lexicon used; BDAG says 'patron/benefactor,' not 'leader'

Mike identifies a significant lexical error in Payne's argument.

Junia Junias gender of Junia

Junia was female — the debate is largely settled

Mike addresses the gender of Junia.

John 4 Philip Payne woman at the well John 4

Mike's rebuttals to Payne: practical solutions and Jesus' counter-cultural behavior

Mike offers multiple objections to Payne's cultural argument.

Luke 7:36-50 Philip Payne anointing by sinful woman Luke 7:36-50

Jesus regularly broke cultural conventions and didn't avoid suspicion

Mike builds his case that Jesus was not concerned with cultural optics.

Philip Payne woman at the well cultural restriction argument

Five objections to Payne's cultural argument summarized

Mike itemizes his objections to the cultural-restriction thesis.

Luke 10:39-42 Mary and Martha women in theological education Luke 10:39-42

Correction for complementarians: no theology is off limits to women

Mike uses the Mary passage to correct complementarians who would limit what theology women can learn.

1 Timothy 2 1 Corinthians 14:34 John MacArthur 1 Timothy 2 1 Corinthians 14:34 John MacArthur

Two key passages used by strong complementarians to deny women speaking publicly: 1 Corinthians 14:34 and 1 Timothy 2

Mike identifies the passages that fuel the opposing view.

functional eldership women teaching

Important qualifiers: context, frequency, and whether a woman is functionally serving as an elder matter

Mike adds nuance about when teaching from a woman might cross a line.

1 Timothy 3 soft complementarianism 1 Timothy 3 prophecy argument

The egalitarian move 'prophecy involves teaching, therefore all teaching is acceptable, therefore prophecy equals eldership' blurs God-given distinctions

Mike warns against the slippery-slope reasoning some egalitarians use.

women teaching practical ministry application

Women gifted in teaching should use that gift — find ways that honor biblical limitations

Mike counsels pastors on how to handle gifted women in their churches.

1 Corinthians 12:7 Philip Payne 1 Corinthians 12:7 common good

Second part of gifts argument: Philip Payne says gifts are 'for the common good' so you cannot restrict who a woman teaches

Mike addresses the more challenging claim from Payne.

Colossians 3:16 Priscilla Apollos Colossians 3:16

Colossians 3:16 — mutual teaching applies to all believers including women; Priscilla corrected Apollos

Mike argues that general mutual teaching and admonishing in the church includes women teaching men.

Colossians 3:16 Philip Payne Colossians 3:16 teaching ministry

Rebutting Philip Payne's use of Colossians 3:16 to claim all Christians should have a teaching ministry

Mike addresses Payne's argument that Colossians 3:16 proves every woman should have a teaching ministry.

1 Timothy 2 Galatians 3:28 1 Timothy 2 Galatians 3:28 hermeneutical priority

Galatians 3:28 used by egalitarians to override other passages like 1 Timothy 2

Mike explains how egalitarians deploy Galatians 3:28 as an interpretive rule that forces reinterpretation of complementarian proof texts.

Genesis creation/new-creation dichotomy Genesis hermeneutical warning

Warning against the creation/new-creation dichotomy as an egalitarian argument

Mike issues a broader caution about this type of argument.

Galatians 3:28 Galatians 3:28 circumcision judaizers

Alternative explanation for the Genesis allusion: women do not need to marry a circumcised man to be fully in Christ

Mike offers what he sees as a better explanation for the male/female and Genesis connection in Galatians.

Galatians 3:26 Galatians 3:26 in Christ justification by faith

Sonship benefit #2: Full participation of being in Christ — equal standing regardless of background

Mike identifies the second element of Paul's sonship teaching.

1 Peter 3:1-7 1 Peter 3:1-7 Sarah Abraham

1 Peter 3 proves full heirship status with continued role distinctions

Mike uses 1 Peter 3 as a decisive counter-example to the egalitarian reading.

Exodus Rabbah Beshallach 21:4 Ben Witherington III Madeleine Boucher Seder Eliahu Rabbah 7

Jewish rabbis used similar 'no male and female' language without implying role obliteration

Mike cites ancient Jewish parallels to demonstrate the phrase's cultural meaning was narrower than egalitarians claim.

1 Corinthians 11:3 kephale 1 Corinthians 11:3 headship hierarchy

1 Corinthians 11:3 — the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, the head of Christ is God

Mike presents the key verse establishing male headship.

1 Corinthians 11 Ephesians 5 1 Corinthians 11 Ephesians 5 contextual argument

Bible study argument introduced: Paul's context in 1 Corinthians 11 and Ephesians does not imply authority

Mike introduces the third egalitarian argument — the contextual/exegetical claim.

John Chrysostom John Chrysostom head commands the body steersman metaphor

Full Chrysostom quote: 'thou art the head of the woman... let the head regulate the rest of the body' — Chrysostom strongly supports headship as authority

Mike reads the full Chrysostom passage that Kroeger selectively quoted.

Ephesians 5:23 kephale hierarchy Ephesians 5:23

Exegetical Dictionary of the NT (1990): kephale refers to 'hierarchy of God, Christ, man, woman' — sovereignty in Eph 5:23

Mike surveys the EDNT.

1 Peter 3:7 weaker vessel 1 Peter 3:7 co-heirs

1 Peter 3:7 -- Instructions to husbands: understanding, honor, and equal inheritance

Mike presents the husband's obligations that balance the wife's submission.

Proverbs 31:11-16 Proverbs 31 woman Proverbs 31:11-16 Proverbs 31 woman wife's independence

Proverbs 31 woman as model of wife with real authority and independence

Mike uses Proverbs 31 to show the ideal wife is not micromanaged.

household codes Josephus Against Apion

Josephus' household code actually supports complementarian view, not egalitarian

Mike argues the Josephus example backfires on the egalitarian case.