← All Topics

1 Timothy 2

All content tagged with this topic across every database — articles, Mike Winger ideas, and verse entries on one screen.

...more

86 articles, 22 ideas, 0 theology entries

Articles (86)

2025-08-04 egalitarian_argument Cheryl Schatz

Women In Ministry Research Notes

Collection of 22 research notes from Cheryl Schatz's Logos notebook on women in ministry, covering head coverings in 1 Corinthians 11, kephale as source, Genesis creation narratives, Ephesians 5 mutual submission, and Craig Keener's lecture notes on women's ordination.

2025-02-02 egalitarian_argument Cheryl Schatz

1 Timothy 1:3 — The Urgent Need for Timothy in Ephesus: False Teachers

Commentary clippings and research notes on 1 Timothy 1:3, establishing that Paul's primary concern in writing to Timothy was to combat false teaching in Ephesus. Multiple commentaries confirm the false teachers likely held leadership positions, and that Timothy was given Paul's own authority to command them to stop. This false-teaching context is foundational for understanding Paul's instructions in 1 Timothy 2:12.

2024-09-03 response Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams

Where Mike Winger Went Wrong on Women

Comprehensive response to the entire Mike Winger Women in Ministry video series (Parts 1-13)

2024-06-19 response Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams

The Debates Over 1 Timothy 2

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the debates over 1 Timothy 2:11-15

2024-06-11 complementarian_argument T. Woznek

Obedience is not a secondary issue

The article argues that the restriction on women serving as pastors, grounded in 1 Timothy 2:12, is not a secondary or debatable theological issue but a plain obedience issue. The author contends Paul's prohibition is rooted in creation order (not culture), making it transcultural and non-negotiable, and that egalitarian interpretations require "obliterating" what Paul plainly says. The piece ends with a challenge to egalitarians: what does obedience or disobedience to this passage actually look like?

2024-02-07 response Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams

Why Mike Winger is Wrong About “Authenteō” in 1 Timothy 2:12 – and Why It Matters

Response to Mike Winger's Women in Ministry Part 12 on the meaning of authenteō in 1 Timothy 2:12

2023-12-13 response Andrew Bartlett & Terran Williams

A First Response to Mike Winger’s 11½ Hrs Video on 1 Timothy 2

A first response to Mike Winger's 11.5-hour Women in Ministry Part 12 video on 1 Timothy 2

2017-06-07 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free? Part 4: 1 Timothy 2 Deception & the First Created

[Music] 1 Timothy Chapter 2 has been a difficult passage for Bible interpreters because of several hard to understand verses yet while Paul's reasoning is thought to be somewhat obscure this chapter has been seen by some as the clearest passage that says when women are not allowed to teach or to hav...

2012-02-24 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Stubble Straw And Scarecrows Diane Sellner

In 2006 my DVD Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free came out and since that time I have seen my share of scarecrows who are intent on destroying the message of women in ministry. One such scarecrow refuses to go away and it is time to create a blog post where others who have been hurt by the issue

2012-02-07 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Masculine Christianity

This is part 2 of What God intended at creation and it is inspired by a recent lecture given by John Piper where he states that God’s intention for Christianity is for it to have a “ masculine feel “. After discussing John Piper’s Masculine Christianity, I will give my critique of his masculine argu

2011-09-22 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Eve Prototype

This post is the second part of an expansion on the reasons why I believe that 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is about one specific woman and why a general reference to women does not line up with the grammar within the surrounding context. The first points 1 – 4 are discussed here

2011-06-25 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Specific Or General Woman

This post will be an expansion on the reasons why I believe that 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is about one specific woman and why a general reference to women does not line up with the grammar within the surrounding context. I will also consider the challenge to my view from the new verbal aspect theory

2011-06-05 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Prohibit Teaching A Man

Some egalitarians suggest that the object “a man” in 1 Timothy 2:12 should rightfully be connected to only one verb “authentein” and that the infinitive form of the verb “to teach” was not meant to be connected to the object “man”

2011-04-14 debate Cheryl Schatz

1 Timothy 212 Prohibitions Revisited

I started a post months ago and then life became so complicated I had to set my blog aside to cope. This post will now be the new “home” on the discussion on whether 1 Timothy 2:12 has two prohibitions or one

2010-12-14 debate Cheryl Schatz

1 Timothy 212 Two Prohibitions Or One

## 1 Timothy 2:12 prohibitions: Two or One

2010-08-10 commentary Cheryl Schatz

1 Timothy 215 Going Deeper

1 Timothy 2:15 has been one of the most puzzling verses to decipher throughout church history. One of the difficult things in interpreting this verse is the translator’s rendering of some difficult grammar

2010-08-03 commentary Cheryl Schatz

A Woman Anaphoric

In a recent blog post , there has been some discussion on 1 Timothy 2:11, 12 in the comment section, and the question of whether “a woman” is generic woman or a specific woman. I always appreciate questions and challenges on my position as it continually pushes me to continue to do research in order

2010-04-11 commentary Cheryl Schatz

The Path Of The Last Adam

The path of the last Adam was a path that took Him from Heaven to earth, from the earth to the grave and from the grave to resurrection power on display as our  Lord, Savior and King. But a study in contrast with the first Adam shows us the stark contrast to the faithfulness that the last Adam offer

2010-03-01 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Women More Easily Deceived

Another reason some complementarians claim for denying women opportunities to minister in the church is that it is said that women are more easily deceived than men so men alone are permitted to minister in the church. A good example of this kind of rationale is found here with this excerpt:

2010-02-17 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Neopatriarchs Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz

According to those who have been followed a trail left by our old friend Neopatriarch (who many of you may recall was the young complementarian who used to post challenges on this blog until he left in exasperation when his arguments didn’t make the grade),  he has apparently been presently himself

2010-01-11 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Using Pauls Authority

Paul’s use of “I am not allowing” in 1 Timothy 2:12 has caused a lot of speculation regarding his reasons for disallowing certain activities. In this post, we are going to look at this phrase very carefully

2009-10-28 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Southwestern Asserts Male Headship

## Southwestern Seminary and their policy of male headship

2009-09-30 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Neopatriarch Once Again Fails To Refute Cheryl Schatz

## Challenging my position that 1 Timothy 2:15 is a single woman

2009-08-17 debate Cheryl Schatz

Mike Seaver Cheryl Schatz 5

## Are Men Restricted

2009-08-05 debate Cheryl Schatz

Mike Seaver And Cheryl Schatz Discussdebate Women In Ministry 4

## Are Witnesses and Repetition needed to Prove Women may not teach the Bible

2009-07-24 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Jimmy Carter Leaves Sbc

## What made Jimmy Carter leave the SBC

2009-07-22 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Wayne Grudem 6

This is the part 6 of answering Wayne Grudem’s “ Open Letter to Egalitarians ” and his “Six Questions That Have Never Been Satisfactorily Answered”. Today I am posting his sixth question, Suzanne McCarthy’s answer and my own questions below that

2009-07-18 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Wayne Grudem 5

This is the part 5 of answering Wayne Grudem’s “ Open letter to Egalitarians ” and his “Six Questions That Have Never Been Satisfactorily Answered”. Today I am posting his fifth question, Suzanne McCarthy’s answer from the Greek and my own questions below that

2009-07-14 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Wayne Grudem 4

This is the part 4 of answering Wayne Grudem’s “ Open letter to Egalitarians ” and his “Six Questions That Have Never Been Satisfactorily Answered”. Today I am posting his fourth question, Suzanne McCarthy’s answer from the Greek and my own questions below that

2009-06-15 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Semigalitariansim And Feminist Air

When does explaining God’s Word make one an enemy of the church. According to Mike Seaver, a woman who is allowed to teach the Word of God to men, even if she is under the authority of her husband and even if she has received authority from her pastor to teach the Bible (and assuming her pastor is m

2009-06-14 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Woman Called As Missionary Has Regrets

Recently, I received an email from a woman who purchased my 4 DVD set “Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free. ” and then wrote me about the impact that the DVDs had on her

2009-05-30 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Neopatriarch Fails To Refute Cheryl

Some have wondered why “Chris” the complementarian stopped posting here. Apparently, he could not get his refutation of my work to stand in an interactive forum so he moved it over to a place where he could have the floor to himself

2009-04-19 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Paul_And_Genesis

This is the sixth in a series of simulated interviews with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day

2009-04-02 commentary Cheryl Schatz

5 Apostle Paul They

This post is the fifth one of a simulated interview with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day

2009-03-25 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Round 4 Interview With The Apostle Paul

This post is the fourth one of a simulated interview with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day

2009-03-20 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Round 3 Interview With Paul On A Woman

This post is the third one of a simulated interview with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day. Doug, a strong complementarian has been given the opportunity to ask Paul about

2009-03-19 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Round 2 Interview With Paul

This post is the second one of a simulated interview with the Apostle Paul taken from the position of what he might say if we could transport Paul from the New Testament account through a time tunnel into our present day. While Paul gets to experience life in the 21st century, Doug, a strong complem

2009-01-22 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Did The Serpent Have More Knowledge Than Man

The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood has published a book called Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and on page 73, John Piper and Wayne Grudem write that Adam was ordained as the one responsible for the life of the garden. The reference is in response to a quote from 1 Timothy 2:14

2009-01-07 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Was 1 Timothy 2 Written To The Church

Complementarians claim that 1 Timothy 2:12 is universally applicable because they say it was written for the church to know how to behave. According to John MacArthur, in God’s High Calling for Women part 1 , 1 Timothy was written to “set the church in order”

2009-01-01 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Reading The Scriptures Without A Male Bias

In the beginning God made male and female. Together they were to do God’s work on earth but unfortunately the fall happened and their work done together as equals was challenged by the man who took the sole rule for himself

2008-12-01 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Do Egalitarians Twist The Scriptures

The charge is often laid that egalitarians twist the scriptures. I would like to apply a saying that I read recently

2008-12-01 debate Cheryl Schatz

The All New 1 Corinthians 1434 35 Church

I don’t do “humor” too much on this blog, although I love humor and I love to laugh. The issue of women in ministry is normally a serious one but I couldn’t resist this funny cover that comes from my friend Pastor Jon Zens

2008-11-01 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Pulpit Authority

In my last post called 1 Timothy 2, authority and the magical pulpit , I was waiting for someone to bring up Hebrew 13:17. Since no one brought up this verse in the comments, but I did receive an email that asked me to respond to how this scripture fits in with my last post, I thought my response sh

2008-10-30 commentary Cheryl Schatz

1 Timothy 2 Authority And The Magical Pulpit

Many people feel that the pulpit is a place for authoritative proclamation. However many people also believe that the pulpit gives a man that authority and allowing someone into the “pulpit” who isn’t allowed to exercise authority over the sheep, an authority that the pulpit gives them, is seen as a

2008-10-02 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Let Her Learnor Not

In our continuing discussion of 1 Corinthians 14:34-36, we come to the problematic area of learning

2008-09-26 commentary Cheryl Schatz

A Deeper Look 1Tim2

This is a response to an article called “ A Deeper Look into: 1 Timothy 2:12 ” by an author posting by the email address of carmradio@ymail. com on September 23, 2008

2008-09-06 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Public Statement Regarding Matt Slick

Public Statement regarding the Cheryl Schatz initiated Matthew 18 meeting with Matt Slick (CARM)

2008-07-27 debate Cheryl Schatz

The Unfaithful Watchman

In the last article we saw that God gave additional information to Adam and his wife regarding what they were allowed to eat and God gave freedom for them to be fruit inspectors as he gave them a test to know what was good food. In another post we will talk more about Eve’s words to the serpent and

2008-07-11 debate Cheryl Schatz

Asking Right Questions

Have you ever found that your discussions with hierarchists goes nowhere fast because they say they have heard the egalitarian arguments before and they are not willing to listen to what you have to say. Perhaps we are missing an opportunity to engage them because we are wanting to teach them first

2008-06-20 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Was Adam A Type Of Christ

Recently I received a request to post my ideas on why Adam chose to sin when he was not deceived. The writer went on to ask:

2008-06-19 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Was The Man Given Authority To Rule The Woman

This is the fifth and final response to Matt Slick’s article called Genesis 2, Adam and Eve, and Authority

2008-06-16 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Authority And Created Order

In this fourth part of my response to Matt Slick’s article called “Genesis 2, Adam and Eve, and Authority” , I am going to deal directly with Matt’s comments regarding authority and created order. Matt writes:

2008-06-09 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Noodling With The Greek Grammar

While I have made a very strong point of the Greek grammar in 1 Timothy 2:15 with the singular “she” and the plural “they” (no specific gender for “they”), some have been trying hard to wiggle out of the implications that Paul is referring to a specific woman because the only living person at that t

2008-05-18 debate Cheryl Schatz

Eve Deceived Adam Not

For a PDF copy of this article click here Eve was Deceived pdf file

2008-05-17 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Woman Representative

This post is an answer to Matt Slicks article called “1 Timothy 2:9-15 “a woman” is representative of all women as “a man”represents all men”

2008-05-17 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Should Comps Debate

While there has been some genuine, respectful dialog between complementarian and egalitarian scholars, more often than not, the emotions that are brought into the dialog have brought less than respectful debate. The body of Christ is meant to fight the enemy together but when some turn their weapons

2008-05-11 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Only One Verse

In my continuing review of CARM and Matt Slick’s articles on women in ministry, this post is about Matt’s article titled “ Only one verse prohibits women to teach men, so it doesn’t apply to the whole church ”

2008-05-09 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Matt Slick She They

This is a continuation of my evaluation of Matt Slick’s articles on women in ministry. Matt has been working for weeks to try to refute my interpretations

2008-05-07 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Answering Matt Slicks Agenda On 1 Timothy 2:12

This is part 2 of answering the complementarian objections of Matt Slick on 1 Timothy 2:11-15. See part one here

2008-05-06 commentary Cheryl Schatz

1Tim2Objections

My article laying out the original argument showing that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a specific woman that Paul forbids from teaching is here

2007-09-30 commentary Cheryl Schatz

The Rest Of The Story 1 Timothy 211 15 And Matt Slick

> Proverbs 18:17 (ESV) The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him

2007-09-26 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Matt Slick And Cheryl Schatz Debate 2

Matt Slick and I had an interesting discussion on whether Paul was stopping true biblical teaching in 1 Timothy 2:12 or whether Paul was stopping error. My answer concerning the imperative command to let a woman learn (1 Timothy 2:11) and the fact that all teaching by “a woman” was to be stopped unt

2007-09-23 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Debating Women In Ministry Round 2

On Wednesday September 26, 2007 I will be having round number 2 with Matt Slick on the issue of women in ministry. We will be dealing with 1 Timothy 2 and the issues of whether “a woman” is a specific woman in Ephesus or whether Paul is prohibiting all Christian women from teaching men (or some vari

2007-09-19 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Debate Audio Between Matt Slick And Cheryl Schatz

If you didn’t get a chance to hear the debate regarding women Pastors between Matt Slick of CARM and myself, you can hear it at this link

2007-09-08 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Debating On Women Pastors

Did you ever feel pulled in a direction you really didn’t want to go in. Well, this has been my life for the last 3 1/2 years

2007-03-30 commentary Cheryl Schatz

1 Timothy 2 Video Preview Now Available

I have posted a second preview of my “Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free. ” DVD on YouTube

2007-03-30 commentary Cheryl Schatz

1 Corinthians 11 Should Women Be Silent

I have posted a third preview of my “Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free. ” DVD on YouTube

2007-01-19 commentary Cheryl Schatz

What Law Does Satan Agree With

I should call this post Part Four of “Does God have one unique law. ” but instead I chose to make it a “unique” post of its own

2007-01-15 commentary Cheryl Schatz

The Case Of The Battling Proof Texts Part Two

In part one, we discussed the fact that the Bible does not contradict itself so when a complementarian has a “proof text” that is used to prove that women are not allowed to teach the Bible to men, they must also deal with the apparent contradictions of this view. Here are some of the contradiction

2007-01-09 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Wim Video Preview On Youtube

I have posted a preview of my “Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free. ” DVD on YouTube

2006-12-27 debate Cheryl Schatz

Why Was Adams Sin More Serious Than The Sin Of Eve Part Two

While we have seen from part one that Adam’s sin was said to have been a deliberate transgression of the covenant and as a result it was a treacherous act against God (Hosea 6:7) where does that leave the seriousness of Eve’s sin

2006-12-21 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Why Was The Sin Of Adam More Serious Than The Sin Of Eve Part One

While some believe that Adam was the representative head of the human race and merely brought sin into the world because he was “head” (i. e

2006-12-11 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Why Was Adam Not Deceived

1 Timothy 2:13, 14 show that the first creation of Adam is connected to the fact that Adam was not deceived. Why was Adam not deceived

2006-12-09 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Does God Have One Unique Law Part Three

In this part three of “Does God have one unique law. ” we will be discussing the last set of circumstances that set apart the “law” that complementarians say God made that forbids godly Christian women from teaching correct biblical doctrine to men

2006-12-07 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Does God Have One Unique Law Part Two

Complementarians have stated that God has a law that forbids godly Christian women from teaching correct biblical doctrine to men. This law, they say, is revealed in 1 Timothy 2:12

2006-12-02 commentary Cheryl Schatz

What Does 1 Timothy 211 15 Mean

I was challenged to present my view of 1 Timothy 2:11-15 on another blog and I thought it would be good to summarize my view on my own blog. Here is the teaching from “Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free

2006-11-29 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Does God Have One Unique Law Part One

If complementarians are right in their interpretation of 1 Timothy 2:12, then God must have one completely unique law. This “law” forbidding women from teaching the bible to men is not like any other law in the bible

2006-11-22 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Could The Messiah Have Been A Woman

Since God is neither male nor female, some have suggested that the Messiah could have been born a female. I would respectfully like to differ with that view

2006-09-23 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Can Complementarians Agree To Disagree

I sent a copy of our DVD “Women in Ministry Silenced or Set Free. ” to the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood in February of 2006 and this summer I finally received a response

2006-07-02 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Is There A Law That Forbids Women From Teaching Men

> Q: Isn’t there a law in 1 Timothy 2:11-15 that forbids women from teaching the Bible to men. Why are you disregarding this law

2006-04-06 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Doesnt 1 Timothy 13 List Only Males As False Teachers

> Q: In WIM you say that 1 Timothy 1:3 “charge some that they teach no other doctrine” means people male or female. However isn’t the technical grammar of “some” as singular masculine

2006-03-19 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Isnt It A Sin For A Woman To Teach Men

> Q: Doesn’t Paul’s command in 1 Timothy 2:12 for women not to teach men show that to disobey this command is a sin

2006-03-13 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Would Your Arguments Have Strength Without 1 Timothy 215

> Q: It also seems that 1 Timothy 2:15 is crucial for your interpretation. The word ‘she’ is a definite point in your favor

2006-03-13 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Why Do You Say That Animals Were Created After Adam

> Q: In your section on 1 Timothy 2, you state that Adam saw some of the animals being created, perhaps the mates of the animals already created on day six. However, says that God had formed “all of the beasts” (NIV) or “every beast” (NASB)

2006-03-13 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Isnt A Woman From 1 Timothy 2 Clear That She Is Generic Woman

> Q: You say that “a woman” in 1 Timothy 2:11 & 12 is the same terminology as Paul calling “a man” living in sin in 1 Corinthians 5. Wouldn’t you have to admit that the normal grammatical reading in 1 Corinthians 5 which says that Paul is talking about a particular man, not “all men”, is clearer

2006-03-11 commentary Cheryl Schatz

Recommendations For Wim

> Women in Ministry: Silenced or Set Free. ” as a whole is a very well produced and presented multi-media teaching series on the legitimacy and freedom of women to be in any ministry that God should call them to

Mike Winger Ideas (22)

If egalitarians are right, passages like 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 14 must be reinterpreted

Women Leaders in the New Testament: Women in Ministry part 4

Mike's tentative position: teaching allowed if it doesn't carry eldership authority; real-life examples balance rules

Women Leaders in the New Testament: Women in Ministry part 4

Two egalitarian views on women apostles

Were Women Apostles in the New Testament? Women in Ministry part 5

The egalitarian 'trump card' of Junia as apostle does not work

Were Women Apostles in the New Testament? Women in Ministry part 5

What was uniquely priestly was the mediating function, which now belongs to all believers

Things I Didn't Know as a Complementarian: Women in Ministry part 6

Two key passages used by strong complementarians to deny women speaking publicly: 1 Corinthians 14:34 and 1 Timothy 2

Things I Didn't Know as a Complementarian: Women in Ministry part 6

Galatians 3:28 used by egalitarians to override other passages like 1 Timothy 2

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

Ben Witherington III's (1981) two arguments against over-reading the Genesis allusion

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

The silver bullet uses a passage not about the topic to override passages that are about the topic

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

Galatians 3:28 does not prove complementarianism right either — it is simply about a different topic

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

Rhetorical challenge: if 'no Jew or Gentile' means Gentiles can be elders, why can't women?

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

Hypothetical: if Scripture required Jewish elders, would you accept it?

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

Egalitarians use a verse not about the topic because the verses about the topic are unhelpful to them

The Egalitarian "Silver Bullet" Bible Verse: Women in Ministry part 7

Genesis 2 recap: six indicators of Adam's pre-fall leadership over Eve.

How Women Could and Couldn’t Lead in the Old Testament: Women in Ministry part 3

Final conclusions: male headship is biblical, complementarian, and to be celebrated

All The Head Covering Debates (1 Cor 11): Women in Ministry part 10

Conclusion 1: Complementarian position does not depend on 1 Timothy 2

ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this)

Conclusion 4: It is not about a particular problem in Ephesus

ALL The Debates Over 1 Tim 2_11-15: Women in Ministry part 12 (it took me a year to make this)

Women speaking in Acts and prophesying in church shows 1 Timothy 2 is not a ban on women speaking at all.

Answering Questions From Live Chat Today on Theology, Apologetics and the Christian Life

Women teaching men in a pastoral/leadership role: Mike reiterates his complementarian position.

Answering Questions From Live Chat Today on Theology, Apologetics and the Christian Life

About Theophanies & Christophanies: Would you say that every theophany is a Christophany? (John 1: 17-18, Jude 1:5, John 8: 58, Matthew 11: 27, 1 Timothy 2:5)

20 Questions with Pastor Mike (Episode 54)

Not Enough Prayer in Church?: Why do we pray so little collectively during Sunday services? Singing makes up 40%, while praying roughly 1-2%. This does not seem to line up biblically or historically (Acts 2: 42; 1 Timothy 2:1-8).

How much should pastors be paid? 10 Qs with Mike Winger (Ep 41)

Winger explains the reason for his extensive long-COVID delay in completing the Women in Ministry series: the number of complex texts and exegetical issues in 1 Timothy 2 is genuinely large, and he refuses to produce a rushed or shallow treatment of a topic that will have real impact on people's lives and churches. This reflects his broader ministry philosophy of thoroughness over speed.

Just winging it (8-year anniversary stream)

Related Comments (20)

Cheryl Schatz 2022-08-29T14:24:43-07:00

Welcome Ramona, You said > however, when the instructions for the Garden were given, she was not yet created The very first time that the instructions were given what they could eat is found in Gen...

Marg Mowczko 2010-10-28T19:35:23-07:00

@Kristen 86 Thank you so much for your excellent link regarding “a one woman man” typically translated as “the husband of one wife”! I love it! Here is an excerpt: “Two of the most prominent comp...

Craig 2010-10-30T19:16:57-07:00

Hi Mark, You said “The shift to ‘gyne’ in verse 11 is obvious that the previous discussion therefore has not been applied to them. This is simple logic!” I asked a related question a few weeks a...

Marg Mowczko 2010-11-05T23:31:23-07:00

Mark @ 129 “Now considering ‘teach’ must be positive to be consistent with the rest of the NT, authentein must also be. This is the only possible syntactical possibility.” I am genuinely aghast that ...

Cheryl 2007-01-02T14:32:14-07:00

Ron, All of Eve’s children have the sin nature except for Jesus because all of Eve’s offspring (except again for Jesus) have a human father. Eve did not deliberately sin but scripture says she â€...

Cheryl 2007-03-07T20:20:12-07:00

Good day Kerryn (that’s Canadian for gidday!) Great questions. You said: > The verses you use to make your point regarding Adam being a ‘man’ use the word anthropos, ([Romans 5:12,19](logos4:/...

Cheryl 2006-12-03T15:37:17-07:00

Thank you Rusty for your comments! Two things I would like to comment back on. In 1 Cor. 11:3 although the NASB says the man is the head of the woman, the understanding in commentaries is always that ...

Peter Kirk 2006-12-04T22:57:30-07:00

Well, I didn’t say I could understand the Bergen book, only that I have it! But I have worked on a translation of the Hebrew Bible, as well as the Greek NT, and so I do know a little Hebrew. I now un...

Michael Kruse 2006-12-10T20:15:08-07:00

#1 Cheryl, your last comment was four pages single spaced when I copied into a word document. This post and the comments we are all making here may be your first book! 🙂 I am going to address several...

Cheryl 2006-12-11T03:39:03-07:00

Michael, I am going to start another post on my blog to deal specifically with the issues that you have brought up regarding Genesis. I will move your comments over to that discussion so that we can ...

Chris 2009-03-19T03:17:48-07:00

Cheryl, I understand your position on [1 Timothy 2:12-15](logos4:///Bible/1Ti 2.12-15) to be that Paul is telling one specific wife in the church to stop teaching her husband false doctrine, and that...

pinklight 2009-03-19T14:43:04-07:00

‘Your claim that one specific wife is in view is based on 1) the singular form ‘a woman’ in verses 11-12, 2) the shift from ‘she’ to ‘they’ in verse 15, and 3) your claim that Paul is talking about a ...

Cheryl Schatz 2009-09-21T09:03:44-07:00

Steve, Many say that Paul’s meaning is “clear” and “simple”. The problem with this is that those who say that Paul’s wisdom is “clear” and “simple” may be of the ones who distort Paul’s words in the...

gengwall 2009-09-21T09:43:18-07:00

Steve, I’m unclear about your meaning. What do you believe the clear meaning of 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is?...

Cheryl Schatz 2009-09-27T21:37:33-07:00

Dear Captain Planet (cool name!) I agree that most egalitarians do not preach on the hard passages of Scripture like [1 Timothy 2:12-15](logos4:///Bible/1Ti 2.12-15) but I am different. Here is why. ...

gengwall 2011-03-01T11:17:31-07:00

Here is how I concluded my [series of posts on 1 Tim 2:11-15](http://gengwall.blogspot.com/2010/02/show-stoppers-1-timothy-2-universal_2952.html). When 1 Timothy 2:11-15 is reviewed with close scruti...

Cheryl 2006-12-11T21:23:55-07:00

Michael, Martin, Paula – go ahead and continue to discuss the issues as I work on my responses. I may not be as fast as you folks are 🙂 Michael: Regarding your first post (#1).  You said:  “Cher...

Cheryl 2006-12-14T22:28:01-07:00

Okay, I’m back. There must be a limit to how long these posts and comments can be because my post kept disappearing. Oh well, to carry on… Michael you said “I am sleepless so I have been surfing the ...

Cheryl 2006-12-15T11:58:22-07:00

Michael, Thanks a bunch for posting some of your questions, because it helps me to understand your mindset and I am hoping I can help you understand my mindset too even if it is only a little. You sa...

Cheryl 2008-01-10T23:05:45-07:00

So sorry, Kerryn I hadn’t realized that I didn’t get to your questions. You said: > “Once we start ‘judging’ sin into different categories i think we can get ourselves into trouble. Are you saying t...