Filter results by source database — Scripture Commentary, Theology, Mike Winger, or Pulpit. Click a tab to narrow to one database.

...more
All (123) Scripture Commentary (10) Theology (5) Mike Winger (107) Pulpit (1)
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Callings are mutually exclusive: husband never told to MAKE wife submit

Mike identifies a key structural feature of the NT marriage instructions.

1 Timothy 3:4-5 mutually exclusive callings abuse prevention 1 Timothy 3:4-5
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Church history has strongly supported complementarian interpretation

Mike appeals to historical consensus as supporting evidence.

church history historical consensus
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Peter Davids' egalitarian view of 1 Peter 3: submission is only for evangelism

Mike begins the egalitarian rebuttal section with Peter Davids from 'Discovering Biblical Equality.'

1 Peter 3:1-7 Discovering Biblical Equality 1 Peter 3:1-7 Peter Davids
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Davids claims 1 Peter 2:13 makes family a 'human institution' like government

Mike examines Davids' argument that family structures are human constructions.

1 Peter 2:13-14 Peter Davids 1 Peter 2:13-14 human institutions
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Rebuttal: marriage is not merely a human institution -- Genesis, Jesus, and Paul all ground it in God

Mike dismantles the 'human construct' argument with multiple scriptures.

Genesis 1-2 Ephesians 5:31-32 Romans 13:1 Genesis 1-2 Ephesians 5:31-32 Romans 13:1
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Davids claims Peter references the Testament of Abraham, not Genesis, for Sarah

Mike examines and refutes Davids' argument about the Sarah reference.

Genesis 18:12 Sarah Genesis 18:12 Peter Davids
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Rebuttal: Every element about Sarah in 1 Peter 3 is found in Genesis

Mike refutes Davids' reliance on extra-biblical sources.

Genesis 1 Peter 3:5-6 Genesis 1 Peter 3:5-6 Peter Davids
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Problems with Davids' reliance on the Testament of Abraham

Mike conducts detailed analysis of the extra-biblical source Davids relies on.

Peter Davids Testament of Abraham E.P. Sanders
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Davids sees 'holy women approved by God' as merely cultural approval, which contradicts the text

Mike identifies internal contradictions in Davids' reading.

1 Peter 3:5 Peter Davids holiness terminology 1 Peter 3:5
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Davids applies different standards to wife commands vs husband commands

Mike identifies a methodological inconsistency in the egalitarian approach.

Peter Davids interpretive double standard
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Craig Keener's addition: Abraham also 'obeys' Sarah (Genesis 16:2, 21:12)

Mike examines Keener's argument for mutual submission in the Abraham-Sarah relationship.

Genesis 21:12 Genesis 16:2 Craig Keener Genesis 21:12 Genesis 16:2
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Lynn Kohick's egalitarian view of Colossians 3:18-19: no talk of husband's authority

Mike examines an egalitarian scholar's treatment of the Colossians passage.

Colossians 3:18-19 hypotasso Colossians 3:18-19 Lynn Kohick
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Kohick's self-contradiction: 'no authority' but also 'don't use domination and power'

Mike identifies a logical inconsistency in Kohick's argument.

Colossians 3:19 Colossians 3:19 Lynn Kohick assuming the conclusion
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Complementarian reading: Paul affirms authority but with Jesus-like caveats

Mike offers the alternative complementarian reading of Colossians 3.

Colossians 3:18-19 servant leadership Colossians 3:18-19
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Mark 10:42-45 parallel: Jesus redefines authority as service, not its elimination

Mike uses Jesus' teaching on servant leadership as a hermeneutical key.

Mark 10:42-45 Linda Belleville servant leadership Mark 10:42-45
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Paul's own practice of restrained authority as a model (2 Corinthians 13:10)

Mike draws a parallel from Paul's apostolic practice.

2 Corinthians 13:10 2 Corinthians 13:10 restrained authority godly authority
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Alternative egalitarian argument from silence on Colossians rejected

Mike briefly addresses the view that Paul only commanded submission in certain cultural contexts.

Colossians 3:18 argument from silence Colossians 3:18
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Introduction to Craig Keener's analysis of Ephesians 5

Mike introduces the scholar whose work will dominate the Ephesians 5 discussion.

Ephesians 5:18-6:9 Philip Payne Linda Belleville Craig Keener
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener's two-pillar case: mutual submission and cultural bowing

Mike summarizes the foundation of Keener's interpretation of Ephesians 5.

Ephesians 5 mutual submission Craig Keener Ephesians 5
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener's cultural background argument: Romans feared women's advancement threatening social order

Mike presents Keener's case about the Roman cultural setting.

Craig Keener Roman cultural setting women's upward mobility in Rome
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Internal vs external messaging theory: Paul supposedly wrote differently for Romans vs Christians

Mike explains the most provocative aspect of Keener's theory.

Ephesians 5 Craig Keener Ephesians 5 dual messaging theory
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener's four steps: household codes, perceived threat, defensive writing, Paul's strategy

Mike summarizes and critiques Keener's chain of reasoning about cultural context.

Craig Keener household codes Roman persecution
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener's only example of defensive household codes: Josephus' Against Apion

Mike examines the sole concrete example Keener offers.

Craig Keener Josephus Against Apion (Contra Apion)
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Josephus' household code actually supports complementarian view, not egalitarian

Mike argues the Josephus example backfires on the egalitarian case.

household codes Josephus Against Apion
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Summary of 'maybe' chain problems in Keener's cultural argument

Mike recaps the weakness of Keener's cultural-bowing case.

Craig Keener cultural bowing idolatry as primary accusation
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener's conclusion: Paul wrote household codes as long-range Roman cultural defense

Mike quotes Keener's concluding summary on the cultural argument.

Craig Keener Paul, Women and Wives Paul's imprisonment
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Paul's actual behavior toward persecution shows he didn't strategically accommodate Roman sensibilities

Mike uses Paul's track record to refute the cultural-defense theory.

Acts 19 Acts 17 Emperor Trajan Acts 19 Acts 17
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Christianity was seen as Jewish -- household codes were not the primary cultural threat

Mike adds another historical argument against the cultural-defense theory.

1 Peter 3 Craig Keener Christianity seen as Judaism Plutarch
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Ephesians 5 doesn't match Paul's style when he writes for evangelistic/cultural purposes

Mike contrasts Ephesians 5 with passages where Paul explicitly adapts for cultural reasons.

Ephesians 5 1 Corinthians 9:20 cultural accommodation Ephesians 5 1 Corinthians 9:20
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Multiple problems with reading Ephesians 5 as cultural defense

Mike lists remaining issues with the cultural-bowing interpretation.

Ephesians 5 Ephesians 5 cultural bowing Josephus parallel
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Ephesians 5 has transcultural indicators, not cultural-bowing indicators

Mike evaluates internal evidence in the passage itself.

Ephesians 5:31-32 Ephesians 5:31-32 transcultural indicators creation grounding
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener on Paul 'avoiding' the words obey and rule -- argument from absent words

Mike addresses the claim that Paul deliberately avoided stronger terms.

Craig Keener argument from absence obey/rule terminology
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Egalitarian interpretation of Ephesians 5:21 as umbrella of mutual submission

Mike explains and critiques the mutual submission reading of verse 21.

Ephesians 5:21 mutual submission Ephesians 5:21 dual messaging
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener and egalitarians find husband's submission in two places

Mike identifies where egalitarians claim to find the husband submitting.

Ephesians 5:21-22 Craig Keener Ephesians 5:21-22 husband's submission
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Mutual submission fails when applied consistently to all three household code groups

Mike's main argument against the mutual submission interpretation.

Ephesians 5:21 1 Timothy 3:4-5 Ephesians 6:1-9 mutual submission Ephesians 5:21 household codes
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

The Christ-church analogy strengthens rather than undermines submission

Mike argues the Christ parallel destroys the mutual submission reading.

Ephesians 5:23-25 Christ and church analogy Jesus' authority Ephesians 5:23-25
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener on verb borrowing: verse 22 borrows 'submit' from verse 21

Mike examines a grammatical argument about the Greek text.

Ephesians 5:21-22 Craig Keener hypotasso Ephesians 5:21-22
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener redefines 'submit' to mean self-sacrificial service

Mike critiques Keener's redefinition of submission.

Craig Keener redefinition of submit love as submission
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Red flag: claiming Paul uses a word differently than everyone in his culture understood it

Mike offers a hermeneutical principle about word redefinition claims.

hermeneutical principle Talmud word meaning in cultural context
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Keener redefines wife's submission as 'only respect' based on Ephesians 5:33

Mike critiques a second redefinition of key terminology.

Ephesians 5:33 Craig Keener hypotasso Ephesians 5:33
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Paul devotes more space to husbands loving than wives submitting -- what does this mean?

Mike evaluates the significance of the imbalanced space given to each instruction.

Ephesians 5 Craig Keener Ephesians 5 space devoted to instructions
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Complementarian heart: different roles, unequal authority, equal value, focused on serving Jesus

Mike articulates the core complementarian vision.

complementarianism equal value different roles
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Titus 2:3-10 refutes the 'careful balancing act' theory about Ephesians 5

Mike uses Titus 2 to show Paul doesn't always balance instructions to both sexes.

Titus 2:3-10 Titus 2:3-10 imbalanced instructions careful balancing theory
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Paul uses hypotasso for bond servants and rulers with clear obedience meaning

Mike shows Paul's consistent usage of the word submit across contexts.

Titus 2:9 Titus 3:1 hypotasso Titus 2:9 Titus 3:1
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

BDAG lexicon definition of hypotasso: 'to cause to be in a submissive relationship, to subject, to subordinate'

Mike appeals to the authoritative Greek lexicon.

BDAG hypotasso lexical definition
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

How Paul IS different from his culture (complementarian distinctives)

Mike distinguishes Paul's teaching from both Roman culture and egalitarianism.

Ephesians 5 self-sacrificial love Ephesians 5 Paul's cultural distinctiveness
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Ancient household codes typically told men what BOTH spouses should do; Paul doesn't

Mike highlights a genuine innovation in Paul's approach.

Ephesians 5-6 household codes personal responsibility Ephesians 5-6
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

How Paul is NOT different from his culture: submit meant authority imbalance to everyone

Mike identifies where Paul aligns with cultural understanding.

original audience understanding hypotasso hermeneutical principle
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Both Paul's culture and Paul valued love in marriage and opposed wife abuse

Mike corrects the misconception that love and non-abuse were Paul's innovations.

love in ancient culture love as command wife abuse in ancient world
Mike Winger idea 2022-08-15

Alternative egalitarian view: Paul meant authority imbalance but only for that culture

Mike addresses the 'cultural binding' interpretation of Ephesians 5.

internal contradiction Craig Keener cultural binding